[00:00:01]
GOING. I'M STILL WORRIED ABOUT. YEAH, JUST JUST ON THE. THE TIME FOR CONVENING HAS ARRIVED,
[I. Call to Order]
SO WE WILL START THIS EVENING'S SERIES OF MEETINGS. I'D LIKE TO CALL THIS MEETING OF THE SANDY SPRINGS CITY COUNCIL TO ORDER FOR TUESDAY, OCTOBER THE 21ST, 2025. WILL THE CITY CLERK PLEASE MAKE THE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND CALL THE ROLL? GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. FIRST, I WOULD LIKE TO REMIND THOSE IN ATTENDANCE. PLEASE SILENCE ALL CELL PHONES AND OTHER ELECTRONIC DEVICES AT THIS TIME. INDIVIDUALS WHO WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THOSE PUBLIC COMMENT CARDS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. PUBLIC COMMENT CARDS ARE AVAILABLE ONLINE AT THE CHAMBER ENTRANCE. JUST A REMINDER, THOSE PROVIDING PUBLIC COMMENT. THEY MAY BE ALLOTTED UP TO THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK ON THEIR SINGLE CHOSEN TOPIC. AS I CALL ROLL. PLEASE CONFIRM YOUR ATTENDANCE. MAYOR RUSTY PAUL, PRESENT COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN PAULSON, COUNCIL MEMBER MELANIE KELLY, COUNCIL MEMBER MELISSA MUELLER HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER JODY ROCHELLE, COUNCIL MEMBER TIBBY DIGIULIO.COUNCIL MEMBER ANDY BAUMAN. PLEASE JOIN ME FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. MADAM CLERK,
[IV. Public Comment]
DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT CARDS? YES. WE RECEIVED TWO PUBLIC COMMENT CARDS THIS EVENING. THE FIRST IS FROM STEVE LEEDS, WHO WILL BE FOLLOWED BY KIMBERLY OLIVER.MR. LEEDS. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS STEVE LEEDS. I LIVE AT 6410 RADIANT TRACE. I AM THE PRESIDENT OF ARIA WEST COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION. MAYOR PAUL COUNCIL ON JANUARY 21ST.
MAYOR PAUL, YOUR PARTING WORDS WERE NEIGHBORHOODS NEED TO BE MORE FLEXIBLE. AND MOUNT VERNON SCHOOL, YOU NEED TO BUILD TRUST. AND I'M HERE TONIGHT WITH KIMBERLY OLIVER TO GIVE YOU AN UPDATE ON OUR NEGOTIATIONS WITH MOUNT VERNON SCHOOL. I'M PARAPHRASING OR TAKE AWAY FROM WHAT MAYOR PAUL SAID, BUT THAT WAS THE MESSAGE WE HEARD. AS A RESULT, THE SCHOOL REACHED OUT TO US IN MARCH. SINCE THEN, WE HAVE BEEN NEGOTIATING WITH THE NEGOTIATING TEAM FROM MOUNT VERNON SCHOOL, WHICH WAS THEIR BOARD CHAIR, THEIR HEAD OF SCHOOL AND ONE OTHER, AND WE HAD REACHED WHAT WE AND THEY CONSIDERED TO BE A BALANCED UNDERSTANDING ON THE SUBSTANCE OF A PERPETUAL DEAL THAT WOULD GOVERN THE LIGHTING, SOUND, LANDSCAPING, BUFFERS AND USE PARAMETERS ON THE SCHOOL'S OUTDOOR ATHLETIC FIELDS ACROSS THE ENTIRE 40 ACRE CAMPUS, WHILE MAINTAINING PARAMETERS OF PEACEFUL AND QUIET ENJOYMENT FOR THE NEIGHBORHOODS. MOUNT VERNON SCHOOL CHOSE TO BUILD ONE FIELD RATHER THAN THE TWO THEY HAD THE RIGHT TO BUILD TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THEIR CROSS COUNTRY AND TRACK FAMILIES AND REDUCE CONSTRUCTION COSTS. IN JULY, KIMBERLY OLIVER AND I PRESENTED THIS BALANCED UNDERSTANDING TO OUR RESPECTIVE NEIGHBORHOODS. HAD A LONG MEETING, LOTS OF QUESTIONS, LOTS OF ANSWERS, AND WE OBTAINED THE APPROVAL OF OUR RESPECTIVE NEIGHBORHOODS AND REPORTED THAT BACK TO THE SCHOOL, WE WERE TOLD THAT UNDERSTANDING WAS ENDORSED BY THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE SCHOOL AS WELL, AND THE SCHOOL ACKNOWLEDGED THE UNDERSTANDING IN A COMMUNICATION TO THEIR SCHOOL FAMILY. ON JULY 25TH, SAYING THAT THERE WAS A BIG ANNOUNCEMENT. THEY STATED, QUOTE, WE BELIEVE WE HAVE ACHIEVED A BALANCED UNDERSTANDING, ACCEPTABLE TO ALL PARTIES AND HOPE TO HAVE THIS FINALIZED IN THE WEEKS TO COME. THIS MEANS THAT WE DO ANTICIPATE HAVING LIGHTS ON THE RON HILL FIELD. THAT PERPETUAL AGREEMENT CALLED FOR TEN NIGHTS OF LIGHTS AND SOUND ON THE FIELD UNTIL 930, AND 18 NIGHTS OF LIGHTS ONLY FOR PRACTICE UNTIL SEVEN IN AUGUST. MOUNT VERNON SCHOOL THEN ADVISED US THAT THEIR ATHLETIC DIRECTOR PUSHED BACK AND WANTED ADDITIONAL NIGHT OF PRACTICE ON MONDAYS. WE SERIOUSLY CONSIDERED THAT AND AGREED TO IT EVEN THEN. OKAY, I'LL PASS THIS ON TO MISS OLIVER. GOOD EVENING. KIMBERLY OLIVER. I'M THE PRESIDENT OF MOUNT VERNON WOODS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, AND I LIVE AT 6485 WILLIAMSON DRIVE. SO WE STARTED TO TALK ABOUT IN AUGUST, THE ATHLETIC
[00:05:04]
DIRECTOR PUSHED BACK AND WE QUESTIONED ADDITIONAL LIGHTS FOR PRACTICE. AND WE UNDER FURTHER CONCESSIONS AND TALKING TO THE NEIGHBORS, MOSTLY IMPACTED. WE AGREED TO THAT.AFTER THAT, MOUNT VERNON SCHOOL CAME BACK AGAIN AND PROPOSED MAJOR CHANGES, INCREASING GAME NIGHT LIGHTS BY 50%, DOUBLING PRACTICE NIGHTS FROM 24 TO 48, EXTENDING PRACTICE HOURS TO 730, AND LIMITING THE AGREEMENT FROM PERPETUITY TO TEN YEARS. AFTER FURTHER CONSIDERATION FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD, WE COUNTERED WITH A 20 YEAR TERM, ONE EXTRA NIGHT OF LIGHTS AND AMPLIFIED SOUND FOR THE FOOTBALL TEAM, AND EXTENDED PRACTICE LIGHTS TILL 730, BUT WE COULD NOT AGREE TO THE DOUBLE THE NIGHT OF PRACTICE LIGHTS. WE WENT THROUGH A LOT OF CONSIDERATION DETERMINING PRACTICE LIGHTS BY THE SEASON, THE GAME SCHEDULE AND HOW MANY TEAMS PLAYED. WE AGREED TO ALLOW PRACTICE LIGHTS FROM JANUARY 15TH TO MARCH 1ST, WHICH IS UNFORTUNATELY THE HARDEST SEASON FOR OUR NEIGHBORS BECAUSE THERE'S NO VEGETATION ON THE TREES.
UNFORTUNATELY, MOUNT VERNON SCHOOL BOARD TREATED THE NEGOTIATION COMPROMISE NOT AS A RESOLUTION, BUT AS A STARTING POINT TO PUSH FOR MORE SEEKING ITS FULL WISH LIST WITHOUT EQUAL REGARD FOR NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT. WE CONSIDERED THE SCHOOL AND TRIED TO ACCOMMODATE THOSE NEEDS. AFTER AGREEING TO A 20 YEAR AGREEMENT INSTEAD OF IN PERPETUITY, ADDING SIX MORE PRACTICE LIGHTS UNTIL 730 AND AN ADDITIONAL ONE MORE FOOTBALL TEAM, MOUNT VERNON SCHOOL WOULD NOT AGREE. WE WERE VERY DISAPPOINTED AND SHOCKED WHEN THE BOARD DID NOT AGREE WITH OUR OUR BALANCED AGREEMENT. IT'S IMPORTANT TO RECALL WHERE WE STARTED. WE DON'T WANT LIGHTS AND MORE IMPORTANTLY, WE CERTAINLY DON'T WANT THE NOISE AND ACTIVITY THAT THOSE LIGHTS WILL BRING. WE WANT PEACEFUL AND QUIET ENJOYMENT OF OUR HOMES, AND WE BELIEVE THEIR EFFORTS WILL CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF OUR TWO COMMUNITIES IN A DETRIMENTAL MANNER. HOWEVER, NOT WANTING TO TO FIGHT THIS FIGHT EVERY YEAR AND UNDERSTANDING THAT AS MAYOR PAUL ASKED US TO DO COMPROMISE REQUIRES SOME FLEXIBILITY AND TRADE OFFS. US WAS TO ACHIEVE AN AGREEMENT THAT WOULD BUY PEACE IN PERPETUITY. IS NOT ACTING IN GOOD FAITH. WHEN YOU COME UP WITH A BALANCED AGREEMENT IN JULY, THEY COME BACK IN AUGUST WANTING MORE.
THEY COME BACK IN SEPTEMBER WANTING MORE AND CHANGING WHAT WE ALL AGREED TO, INCLUDING THE ANNOUNCEMENT THEY MADE TO THEIR OWN FAMILIES IN JULY. SO THAT IS OUR UPDATE. THANK YOU, MISS OLIVER. ANY OTHER? NO. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL CLOSE THE THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD. IS THERE
[V. Approval of Meeting Agenda]
A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MEETING AGENDA, MR. MAYOR? MR. JULIO, I MOVE APPROVAL OF THE MEETING AGENDA FOR TUESDAY, OCTOBER 21ST, 2025. WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. DIJULIO. IS THERE A SECOND SECOND MOTION BY MR. DEGIULIO, SECONDED BY MR. PAULSON, THAT WE APPROVE THE MEETING AGENDA.IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. WE'LL CALL THE QUESTION. THE QUESTION IS ON APPROVAL OF THE MEETING AGENDA. ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION? SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? NO. THE
[VI. Consent Agenda]
MEETING AGENDA IS APPROVED. IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA? MISS ROCHELLE, MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA FOR TUESDAY, OCTOBER 21ST. WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. SCHELL. IS THERE A SECOND SECOND MOTION BY MISS ROCHELLE, SECONDED BY MISS MUELLER, THAT WE APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. WE'LL CALL THE QUESTION. THE QUESTION IS ON APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. ALL IN FAVOR OF THE[VIII. Public Hearing]
MOTION, PLEASE SAY AYE. AYE. ALL OPPOSED. THE CONSENT AGENDA IS APPROVED. MOVING TO PUBLIC HEARINGS. WILL THE CLERK PLEASE READ THE FIRST ITEM? THIS IS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2025 248.CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A METROPOLITAN RIVER PROTECTION ACT CERTIFICATE FOR RIVER CORRIDOR REVIEW. RC 20 504 SS FOR 870 EDGEWATER DRIVE. THIS IS TONIGHT. THIS WILL BE PRESENTED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR GINGER SOTTILE. MISS SOTO, GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION IS THE APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE A METROPOLITAN RIVER PROTECTION ACT CERTIFICATE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER CORRIDOR AT 870 EDGEWATER DRIVE THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO. I'M SORRY. DO YOU WANT ME TO REPEAT IT WHEN IT COMES UP? I WAS TRYING TO READ IT. I COULDN'T
[00:10:03]
FIGURE IT OUT, SO APPRECIATE IT. ALRIGHT, ALRIGHT, HERE WE GO. ALRIGHT, FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION THIS EVENING IS THE APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE A METROPOLITAN RIVER PROTECTION ACT CERTIFICATE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER CORRIDOR AREA AT 870 EDGEWATER DRIVE. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOME, AND THE ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION HAS REVIEWED THIS APPLICATION AND FOUND THAT THE THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER CORRIDOR PLAN, AND GIVEN THIS DETERMINATION, IT IS STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THIS RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE A METROPOLITAN RIVER PROTECTION ACT CERTIFICATE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 870 EDGEWATER DRIVE. ALL RIGHT. YOU'VE HEARD THE REPORT OF THE COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR. WHAT'S THE DESIRE OF COUNCIL? MR. PAULSON? HANG ON, I MOVE. APPROVAL OF AGENDA ITEM 3025 248. APPROVE OF METROPOLITAN RIVER PROTECTION ACT CERTIFICATE FOR RIVER CORRIDOR REVIEW. RC 20 504, SS FOR 870 EDGEWATER DRIVE. MOTION BY MR. PAULSON. IS THERE A SECOND SECOND MOTION BY MR. PAULSON, SECONDED BY MISS MUELLER, THAT WE APPROVE? AGENDA ITEM 2025 248 A RESOLUTION APPROVING METROPOLITAN RIVER PROTECTION ACT CERTIFICATION FOR RIVER CORRIDOR REVIEW. RC 2504, SS FOR 870 EDGEWATER DRIVE. ANY DISCUSSION? OH THAT'S RIGHT, I'M SORRY. PUBLIC HEARING. ANY COMMENTS? ALL RIGHT. WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. WHAT'S THE DESIRE OF COUNCIL? WE GOT THAT. ALL RIGHT. ANY DISCUSSION HAVE TO START OVER AGAIN. GO THROUGH MY SEQUENCE.ANY DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. WE'LL CALL THE QUESTION. THE QUESTION IS ON AGENDA ITEM 2025 248. A RESOLUTION APPROVING METROPOLITAN RIVER PROTECTION ACT CERTIFICATE FOR 870 EDGEWATER DRIVE. ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION? SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? NO. THE ITEM IS
[IX. New Business]
APPROVED. MOVING TO NEW BUSINESS CLERK. PLEASE READ THE FIRST ITEM. THIS IS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2025 249. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AND FOR MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE A NON-BINDING CONCEPTUAL JOB COST ESTIMATE WITH GEORGIA POWER COMPANY FOR OVERHEAD TO UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONVERSIONS FOR THE HAMMOND DRIVE CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, AND TO AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT. THIS IS PRESENTED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR MARTY MARTIN. MR. MARTIN, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, GOOD EVENING. TONIGHT I BRING TO YOU A REQUEST FOR YOUR SUPPORT FOR A NON-BINDING CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE WITH GEORGIA POWER COMPANY. IN THE INTEREST OF PROVIDING OVERHEAD TO UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AS THEY WOULD BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE HAMMOND DRIVE WIDENING PROJECT. S 2193. IN THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT, THE CITY HAS REQUESTED THAT GEORGIA POWER PROVIDE US AN ESTIMATE TO UNDERGROUND THE AERIAL FACILITIES AT AT THE HARLESTON ROAD, CRANE DRIVE AND LAUREL TERRACE CROSSINGS OF THE HAMMOND DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS. GEORGIA POWER'S NON-BINDING COST ESTIMATE FOR THIS WORK IS 905,000, OR $905,000, WITH A PAYMENT TO DUE TO BE DUE LATER. PRIOR TO MOBILIZATION. WITH THAT, ANY QUESTIONS? MAYOR AND COUNCIL. ALL RIGHT. YOU'VE HEARD THE REPORT OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. WHAT'S THE DESIRE OF COUNCIL? MAYOR PAUL? MISS MUELLER, I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE. AGENDA ITEM 2020 5-2 49 APPROVAL OF A NON-BINDING CONCEPTUAL JOB ESTIMATE WITH GEORGIA POWER COMPANY FOR OVERHEAD TO UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONVERSIONS FOR THE HAMMOND DRIVE CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT. WE HAVE A MOTION BY MISS MUELLER. IS THERE A SECOND SECOND MOTION BY MISS MUELLER, SECONDED BY MR. DEGIULIO THAT WE APPROVE? AGENDA ITEM 2025 249 A NON-BINDING CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE WITH GEORGIA POWER FOR OVERHEAD UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONVERSIONS FOR THE HAMMOND DRIVE CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT. ANY DISCUSSION? MISS ROCHELLE? I'M JUST CURIOUS, ARE THEY THE ONLY ONES THAT CAN UNDERGROUND THEIR OWN LINES OR. YES, MA'AM, WE'VE EXPLORED THAT TERRITORY BEFORE WITH THEM AS WE'VE SOUGHT TO TAKE AERIAL FACILITIES UNDERGROUND HERE. SO. AND WE WILL AS WELL BE SEEKING, WE'LL HAVE TO AS WELL DISCUSS RELOCATIONS WITH AT&T AND COMCAST AS THEY ARE OUT THERE AS WELL. THANKS. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. WE'LL CALL THE QUESTION. THE QUESTION IS ON AGENDA ITEM 2025 249, A NON-BINDING CONCEPTUAL JOB COST ESTIMATE WITH GEORGIA POWER FOR OVERHEAD UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONVERSIONS FOR THE HAMMOND DRIVE CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION. SAY AYE. OPPOSED? NO. THE ITEM IS APPROVED. THE CLERK WILL PLEASE READ THE NEXT ITEM.AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2025 250. THIS IS A REQUEST FROM MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE A SUPPLEMENTAL CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT NUMBER ONE, TO THE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS AND THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS PORTION OF THE PATH 400 MULTI-USE TRAIL EXTENSION
[00:15:02]
PROJECT, AND TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT, ALSO PRESENTED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR MR. MARTIN. MAYOR AND COUNCIL. IN THIS CASE, WE ENTERED INTO THE CITY, ENTERED INTO THE ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT FOR THIS PATH 400 PROJECT IN NOVEMBER OF 2024, WITH THE PURPOSE OF AWARDING THE CONTRACT TO THE CURRENT CONTRACTOR, FS SCARBOROUGH, IN THE AMOUNT OF $20 MILLION 150,009 23 AT THE TIME, THE CITY ALSO ANTICIPATED AND SUBSEQUENTLY AWARDED CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING INSPECTION CONTRACT. ATKINS RELEASE IN THE AMOUNT OF 1.489 MILLION, AS WELL AS A MATERIAL TESTING CONTRACT WITH NOVA ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL IN THE AMOUNT OF 285,000. IN NOVEMBER OF THAT YEAR.SUBSEQUENT TO THAT, AND WITH THE REQUEST OF ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING, ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION WAS ABLE TO SOURCE AND PROVIDE THE FUNDS REQUIRED TO TO PROVIDE THE 80% MATCH ON BOTH THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING INSPECTION AND THE MATERIAL TESTING. WITH THAT IN PLACE, THE CITY THEN REQUESTED OF THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION A CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT AMENDMENT. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT TO ENCOMPASS THE ADDITIONAL FUNDS ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION HAD PROVIDED AND ENDORSED THEM OR CAPTURE THEM HERE. WITH AN INCREASE NOW IN THE OVERALL AGREEMENT. TO CAPTURE THE ENTIRETY OF THE COST OF BOTH THE OF CONSTRUCTION, CONSTRUCTION, ENGINEERING, INSPECTION AS WELL AS MATERIAL TESTING WITH THE CITY LOCAL MATCH OF 20% DOCUMENTED AS WELL.
YOU'VE HEARD THE REPORT OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. WHAT'S THE DESIRE OF COUNCIL? MR. DEGIULIO? I MOVE APPROVAL OF ITEM 25 2025 250. THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS AND THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE. ADDITION ON ON ADDITIONAL PORTIONS OF PATH 400 HAVE A MOTION BY MR. DEGIULIO.
IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL. SECOND MOTION BY MR. DEGIULIO, SECONDED BY DOCTOR KELLY, THAT WE APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 2025 TO 50 AND A SUPPLEMENTAL CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS AND GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE SANDY SPRINGS PORTION OF THE PATH 400 MULTI-USE TRAIL EXTENSION. ANY DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. WE'LL CALL THE QUESTION. THE QUESTION IS ON AGENDA ITEM 2025 250, A SUPPLEMENTAL CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS AND GEORGIA DOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS PORTION OF THE PATH 400 MULTI-USE TRAIL EXTENSION. ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? NO. THE ITEM IS APPROVED. THE CLERK WILL PLEASE READ THE NEXT ITEM. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2025 251. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE CONTRACT AWARD TO EXCEL YOUR CONSTRUCTION, LLC TO CONSTRUCT THE MOUNTAIN CREEK ROAD STORMWATER MAINTENANCE PHASE ONE PROJECT, AND TO AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT PRESENTED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR MARTY MARTIN. MR. MARTIN, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, TONIGHT, I BRING FORWARD TO YOU A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AWARD RECOMMENDATION TO EXCEL CONSTRUCTION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE MOUNTAIN CREEK ROAD STORMWATER MAINTENANCE PHASE ONE PROJECT AND REQUEST THE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THAT CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $354,970. IN 2024, THE CITY ENGAGED A CONSULTANT TO DEVELOP PLANS TO CORRECT DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED IN THE STORMWATER SYSTEM UNDERNEATH MOUNTAIN CREEK ROAD, NEAR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 57, 60 AND 5775 MOUNTAIN CREEK ROAD. THE WORK INCLUDED THE WORK DEVELOPED BY THE CONSULTANT INCLUDES RESTORATION OF APPROXIMATELY 90 LINEAR FEET OF 72 INCH CORRUGATED METAL PIPE USING CENTRIFUGALLY CAST CONCRETE PIPE METHOD, INSTALLATION OF ONE CAST IN PLACE REINFORCED CONCRETE HEADWALL WITH VENEER ON THE UPSTREAM EMBANKMENT.
INSTALLATION OF GABY AND BASKETS FOR STREAM BED PROTECTION AND REPLACEMENT OF EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY AT 5775 ASSOCIATED MOUNTAIN CREEK ROAD, ASSOCIATED WITH THE WORK. TO ADVANCE THE PROJECT, CITY ISSUED AN INVITATION TO BID ON APRIL 19TH OF THIS YEAR, AND ONE ADDENDUM WAS ISSUED TO THAT INVITATION TO BID ON SEPTEMBER 12TH OF THIS YEAR. BIDS WERE RECEIVED FROM THREE CONTRACTORS BY SEPTEMBER 19TH, 2025. BID RESULTS. WITH THREE BIDDING CONTRACTORS INDICATED EXCEL CONSTRUCTION LLC AT $354,970, COMPARED VERY FAVORABLY WITH THE ENGINEER'S CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE FOR THE WORK OF 425,000. WITH THAT, STAFF RECOMMENDS WORK THIS PROJECT BE AWARDED TO ACCELERATE CONSTRUCTION AND ADVANCING THIS PROJECT. YOU'VE HEARD THE REPORT OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. WHAT'S THE DESIRE OF COUNCIL MAYOR PAUL? MISS MUELLER, I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE.
AGENDA ITEM 2020 5-2 51 THE APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AWARD TO ACCELERATE CONSTRUCTION, LLC,
[00:20:05]
TO CONSTRUCT THE MOUNTAIN CREEK ROAD STORMWATER MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PHASE ONE PROJECT, AND TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT. WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. MUELLER.IS THERE A SECOND SECOND MOTION BY MISS MUELLER, SECONDED BY DOCTOR KELLY, THAT WE APPROVE? AGENDA ITEM 2025 251 A CONTRACT AWARD TO ACCELERATE CONSTRUCTION TO CONSTRUCT THE MOUNTAIN CREEK ROAD STORMWATER MAINTENANCE PHASE ONE PROJECT. ANY DISCUSSION? MR. PAULSON? THANK YOU. MARTY, REAL QUICK. HAVE WE WORKED WITH ZELLER BEFORE? WE HAVE THEY'RE DOING A COUPLE OF OUR ROADWAY PROJECTS, AS A MATTER OF FACT, RIGHT NOW, AND THEY'VE BEEN DOING VERY GOOD WORK FOR US. YES. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. WE'LL CALL THE QUESTION. THE QUESTION IS ON AGENDA ITEM 2025 251, APPROVING A CONTRACT AWARD TO ACCELERATE CONSTRUCTION FOR THE MOUNTAIN CREEK ROAD STORMWATER MAINTENANCE PHASE ONE PROJECT.
ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION? SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? NO. THE ITEM IS APPROVED. THE CLERK WILL PLEASE READ THE NEXT ITEM. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2025 252. THIS IS CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE APPLICATION TO AND PARTICIPATION IN THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'S TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES AND CONGESTION MITIGATION, AIR QUALITY COMPETITIVE FUNDING PROGRAM, AND TO APPROVE THE REQUIRED LOCAL FUNDING MATCH AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE GRANT AGREEMENT, GRANT AWARD AGREEMENT, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. PRESENTED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR MARTY MARTIN. MR. MARTIN, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, TONIGHT, I BRING BEFORE YOU A REQUEST FOR YOUR APPROVAL FOR US TO ENTER INTO AN APPLICATION FOR A COMPETITIVE FUNDING PROGRAM FOR A FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES AND CONGESTION MITIGATION GRANT. THIS YEAR, GDOT IS ADMINISTERING THIS COMPETITIVE PROPOSAL AS OPPOSED TO ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION IN YEARS PAST. SANDY SPRINGS IS ELIGIBLE FOR BOTH TYPES OF FUNDING. BOTH THE TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES AND CONGESTION CONGESTION MITIGATION AIR QUALITY GRANTS, OFTEN REFERRED TO AS CMEC GRANTS NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY, WAS ISSUED SEPTEMBER 15TH AND APPLICATIONS ARE DUE FOR THIS GRANT OCTOBER 31ST OF THIS YEAR. QUICK OVERVIEW OF ELIGIBLE PROJECT TYPES FOR THIS GRANT MONIES. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES AS EVIDENCED BY THE TA PORTION AND ROUNDABOUTS AND OTHER EMISSION REDUCING INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CMAC PORTION OF THE GRANT. PROJECT REQUIREMENTS. AS WITH MOST FEDERAL GRANTS, A 20% LOCAL FUNDING MATCH AND ANOTHER STIPULATION OF THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM IS THAT THE WORK CANNOT INCREASE EMISSIONS WITHIN THE AREA, SO NO CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT OR INCREASED PROJECTS ET-CETERA NO ADDITIONAL LANES ET-CETERA PRIOR TO. GIVEN THOSE THAT MITIGATE EMISSIONS AND REDUCTIONS, AND AS WELL AN ADDED EMPHASIS THIS YEAR IS PROJECTS THAT IMPROVE SAFETY. NOTIFICATION OF AWARD FOR THIS PARTICULAR GRANT IS EXPECTED IN LATE APRIL OF NEXT YEAR. THE PROJECT RECOMMENDED FOR THIS PARTICULAR GRANT IS REVIEW OF ALL ELIGIBLE CANDIDATE SITES WITHIN THE CITY IS A STREETSCAPE SIDE PATH ON HOLCOMB BRIDGE ROAD FROM SPALDING DRIVE TO THE CITY LIMITS AT CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER.
IF YOU ARE FAMILIAR WITH THAT AREA, THERE IS NO DEVELOPMENT AT ALL ALONG THAT ROAD.
SHOULDER ON THE SANDY SPRINGS SIDE OF HOLCOMB BRIDGE ROAD THERE NOW. NO SO THUS NO WALKING OR BICYCLING FACILITIES EXIST OUT THERE ON THAT SIDE OF THE ROAD. THIS PROJECT WOULD CONNECT HOLCOMB BRIDGE ROAD, RIVER EXCHANGE, PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS ALREADY CONSTRUCTED BY THE CITY, AS WELL AS PROVIDE CONNECTION TO COMMUNITY DESTINATIONS INCLUDING GROCERIES, SERVICES AND PARKS OUT IN THE AREA. IT BRIDGES THE GAP THAT WOULD BE ACROSS JURISDICTIONAL NETWORK. CITY OF PEACHTREE CORNERS IS PURSUING CROOKED, A CROOKED CREEK TRAIL INTO THE SOUTH SPALDING DRIVE, AND THE CITY OF ROSWELL HAS SHARED THEIR HAS A PLAN SHARED USE PATH ALONG HOLCOMB BRIDGE ROAD THAT WOULD AS WELL POTENTIALLY CONNECT INTO THIS IMPROVEMENT HERE. REBECCA, WE RECOMMEND THAT COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE PREPARATION OF AN APPLICATION FOR THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT. WITH A TOTAL COST OF $3.5 MILLION, 3,565,000 IS INDICATED HERE, BUT A FEDERAL SHARE REQUEST OF 282,852,000, IN A LOCAL MATCH REQUIRED OF 713,000. THAT LOCAL MATCH, IF YOU SAW THE DATE WHEN THE WE EXPECT THE GRANT TO BE ANNOUNCED, WOULD NOT BE UNTIL APRIL THAT THE GRANT WOULD BE ANNOUNCED. SO WE WOULD LOOK TO NEXT FISCAL YEAR'S BUDGET AS THE REQUIREMENT FOR THIS PARTICULAR LOCAL MATCH IF THAT GRANT WERE APPROVED. SO IN ADVANCE, THOUGH THE AGENCY SEEKING CITY ENDORSEMENT OF OR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT A LOCAL GRANT OF LOCAL MATCH REQUIREMENT. WITH
[00:25:04]
THAT MAYOR AND COUNCIL, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS PROJECT? ALL RIGHT. YOU'VE HEARD THE REPORT OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. WHAT'S THE DESIRE OF COUNCIL MAYOR PAUL? MR. PAUL, I MOVE APPROVAL OF AGENDA ITEM 2025 252 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZE APPLICATION TO PARTICIPATE IN THE GEORGIA DOT TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES AND CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY COMPETITIVE FUNDING PROGRAM AND APPROVE THE REQUIRED LOCAL FUNDING. HAVE A MOTION BY MR. PAULSON. IS THERE A SECOND SECOND MOTION BY MR. PAULSON, SECONDED BY MR. ROCHELLE, THAT WE APPROVE? AGENDA ITEM 2025 252 AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION TO AND PARTICIPATION IN THE GEORGIA DOT TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES AND CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY COMPETITIVE FUNDING PROGRAM. ANY DISCUSSION, MR. PAULSON? MAYOR PAUL, I HAVE TO ADJUST WHAT I MY MOTION BECAUSE I DIDN'T GET TO THE NEXT PAGE.I'M SUPPOSED TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE GRANT AWARD AGREEMENT AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. I DIDN'T FLIP THE PAGE QUICK ENOUGH. SO PLEASE ADD THAT TO MY MOTION.
ALL RIGHT. WE'LL WE'LL WE'LL AMEND YOUR MOTION TO THAT TO INCLUDE THAT. AND I HAVE TWO QUESTIONS, MARTY. TWO THINGS. ONE, THIS IS AN AREA THAT THERE IS NO ABILITY TO WALK OR RIDE ON ON OUR SIDE OF HOLCOMB BRIDGE ROAD. SO THIS IS A GREAT IDEA. I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO HEARING MORE ABOUT THIS. DOES THIS INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION? YES, SIR. THIS IS PROJECT AND IT'S SOUP TO NUTS IN THIS CASE. AND IF YOU NOTICE TO THE NO WALK ABILITY ETC. YOU CAN SEE THE PEDESTRIAN DESIRE PATH THAT THE GRASS ON THAT ROAD SHOULDER. THERE IS EVIDENCE OF THAT. THE OTHER QUESTION IS THERE'S A BIG PROJECT GOING ON AT HOLCOMB BRIDGE AND SPAULDING WHERE THE DOT AND I GUESS GWINNETT COUNTY IS MANAGING THAT PROJECT. YES, SIR. THEY'RE REWORKING THAT PRETTY SIGNIFICANTLY. DOES THAT DOES THIS PROJECT DOVETAIL IN WITH THAT AND HOW HOW WILL IT DOVETAIL IN THERE? IT THE THE PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROVIDED IN THAT PARTICULAR PROJECT ARE RELATIVELY MODEST. AS YOU ARE AWARE, EARLY ON IN TSPLOST, WE DID CONSTRUCT THE SIDE PATH ALREADY ON SPAULDING DOWN TO THAT INTERSECTION. SO JUST IF YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH THE AREA, THERE'S A SIDE PATH THAT GOES EFFECTIVELY FROM OUR NEW PARK. ON SPAULDING DRIVE ALL THE WAY TO THIS INTERSECTION, HOLCOMB BRIDGE AND SPAULDING. THEN THERE'S A VERY SMALL SEGMENT OF SIDEWALK JUST AT THE GAS STATION AT THE CORNER, AND THEN NO DEVELOPMENT, AS YOU NOTE, FROM THERE, THERE, NOR FROM THERE ON HOLCOMB BRIDGE ROAD. THIS PROJECT WOULD EXTEND THAT SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENT THAT THE CITY MADE A FEW YEARS AGO. IF YOU RECOLLECT, AT THE TIME WE PARTNERED WITH GWINNETT TO REPLACE THE BRIDGE AND BUILD THE SIDE PATH AS PART OF TSPLOST THEN. SO THAT'S THE PROJECT ENVISIONED, AND MORE SO IT GLUES INTO THAT EARLIER WORK WE LAID OUT WITH GWINNETT THEN, AS WELL AS IMPROVEMENTS WE'VE MADE IMMEDIATELY AT THE PARK FRONTAGE ON SPAULDING DRIVE AT RIVER EXCHANGE THERE. OKAY. WELL, I JUST DON'T WANT TO COMMIT TO SOMETHING. AND THEN THAT PROJECT CAUSED US TO TEAR IT UP. SO JUST COORDINATE TO MAKE SURE WE'RE NOT STEPPING ON ANYBODY'S TOES. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION, DOCTOR KELLY? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. I HAVE TWO QUESTIONS FOR YOU. I AM CURRENTLY SEARCHING THE TERM SAFETY ACTION PLAN IN OUR WEBSITE. HOW DOES IS IT AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC? HOW DO YOU PULL IT UP? BECAUSE I WANT TO SEE ALL THOSE TIER ONES. I BELIEVE IT'S SAFE STREETS FOR ALL. SAFE STREETS FOR ALL. ALL RIGHT. WE MIGHT WANT TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THAT LANGUAGE.
THEN MY SECOND QUESTION IS THIS PARTICULAR STRETCH. DOES IT IS IT INCLUDED IN OUR CAPITAL SIDEWALK PROGRAM? NO, MA'AM. IT'S NOT IT HAS NOT BEEN SCORED THERE. OH WHY NOT. IS THERE A PARTICULAR REASON? IN MOST CASES, ESPECIALLY ON OUR STATE ROUTES, ROSWELL ROAD BEING A CASE IN POINT, WE HAVEN'T SCORED AND SIDEWALK PROGRAM BECAUSE OF THE VERY LARGE CAPITAL SIZE OF THOSE PROJECTS. WE HAVEN'T SCORED THOSE SEGMENTS. SO NONE OF ROSWELL ROAD, FOR INSTANCE, WAS EVER SCORED IN THE CAPITAL SIDEWALK PROGRAM BECAUSE OF THE VERY NATURE OF THE LARGE CAPITAL INVESTMENT THERE WOULD MAKE THE PROJECTS TOO LARGE FOR CAPITAL SIDEWALKS. THAT'S BEEN A POLICY AND A PRACTICE SINCE WE INSTITUTED BEGAN THE SIDEWALK PROGRAM BACK IN 2008. THIS IS MUCH THE SAME HERE ON HOLCOMB BRIDGE ROAD. OKAY. ALL RIGHT, I FOUND IT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. AND AGAIN, THANK YOU. TIER ONE. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? MISS ROCHELLE, WHEN I WAS READING THIS, I WAS THINKING ABOUT ALL THE GRANTS THAT WE APPROVED. AND I WAS DO WE HAVE A LIST OF ONES THAT GET APPROVED OR. BECAUSE I'M ALWAYS CURIOUS, DID WE GET THIS ONE OR DID WE NOT? WE INCLUDE A PERIODIC UPDATE IN INSIDE SANDY SPRINGS WHEN WE HAVE A FEW TO ANNOUNCE, BUT THEY DO TAKE QUITE SOME TIME. AND WITH MANY OF THE RECENT CHANGES IN WASHINGTON, THERE HAVE BEEN DELAYS ON DECISIONS ABOUT GRANTS. THANKS, MR. MUELLER. SO ACTUALLY, I HAD ASKED FOR THAT. AND YOU DID PUT THAT TOGETHER.
THANK YOU. AND YOU DO SEND IT OUT AND IT'S PROBABLY TIME TO UPDATE THAT. ANY OTHER
[00:30:06]
DISCUSSION. HEARING NONE WE'LL CALL THE QUESTION. THE QUESTION IS ON AGENDA ITEM 2025 252.RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION AND PARTICIPATION IN THE GDOT TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES AND CONGESTION MITIGATION AIR QUALITY COMPETITIVE FUNDING PROGRAM.
ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION? SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? NO. THE ITEM IS APPROVED. THE CLERK WILL PLEASE READ THE NEXT ITEM. AGENDA ITEM. EXCUSE ME. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2025 253. THIS IS CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN GEORGIA POWER COMPANY AND THE CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED AT LAND LOT 84 OF THE 17TH DISTRICT, FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AND OR DEPICTED IN THE ORIGINAL LEASE AND THE AMENDMENT, AND TO AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE SAME PRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR OF RECREATION AND PARKS, BRANT WALKER. MR. WALKER, EVENING MAYOR AND COUNCIL. THE CITY AND GEORGIA POWER ENTERED INTO A LEASE AGREEMENT IN APRIL 2012 TO PROVIDE RIVER ACCESS AND A DOG PARK ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT MORGAN FALLS. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE CITY AND GEORGIA POWER ENTERED INTO THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THAT LEASE AGREEMENT AND MAY OF 2022 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SECTION TWO A OF THE SPRING WAY TRAIL. SINCE THAT TIME, CITY STAFF HAVE COMPLETED THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS OF THE MORGAN FALLS DOG PARK AND SUBMITTED THAT FOR REVIEW TO GEORGIA POWER. AS PART OF THAT CORRESPONDENCE, GEORGIA POWER INFORMED THE CITY THAT A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE LEASE WOULD BE NECESSARY DUE TO CONDUCTIVE MATERIALS BEING USED IN THE IMPROVEMENTS. THE DOG PARK IMPROVEMENTS WILL INCLUDE NEW SHADE STRUCTURES, DOG AGILITY EQUIPMENT, A WASH STATION, AND IMPROVED GROUND COVER AND DRAINAGE. THEREFORE, STAFF RECOMMEND THAT THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL APPROVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE LEASE AGREEMENT WITH GEORGIA POWER FOR THE PROPERTY AT MORGAN FALLS, SO THAT IMPROVEMENTS TO THE DOG PARK CAN BE COMPLETED. YOU'VE HEARD THE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF RECREATION AND PARKS. WHAT'S THE DESIRE OF COUNCIL MAYOR PAUL DOCTOR KELLY? I MOVE APPROVAL OF AGENDA ITEM 2025253. A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN GEORGIA POWER COMPANY AND THE CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED AT LAND LOT 84, 17TH DISTRICT, FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AND DEPICTED IN THE ORIGINAL LEASE AND THE AMENDMENT, AND TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAME MOTION BY DOCTOR KELLY. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND? ALL RIGHT. MOTION BY DOCTOR KELLY, SECONDED BY MISS MUELLER, THAT WE APPROVE. AGENDA ITEM 2025 253, AUTHORIZING A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN GEORGIA POWER AND THE CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT LAND LOT 84, 17TH DISTRICT, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AND OR DEPICTED IN THE ORIGINAL LEASE. ANY DISCUSSION, MISS MUELLER? NO, IT'S YOUR MOTION. I JUST WANTED TO KNOW WHAT WHAT WAS NEXT? ASSUMING THIS GETS APPROVED. SO ONCE THE LEASE IS APPROVED, THAT BASICALLY GIVES US THE ABILITY TO MOVE FORWARD WITH CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. NOW THAT GEORGIA POWER HAS AGREED TO THE CONCEPT, BECAUSE THAT WAS THE HOLDUP, WAS GETTING THEM TO THIS POINT WHERE WE COULD GET THE OKAY TO CONSTRUCT WHAT WE WANTED TO ON THEIR PROPERTY. SO NEXT WOULD BE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND THEN OUT TO BID. ALL RIGHT. AND WE DON'T HAVE TO ENGAGE THEM OR WAIT ON THEM. NO, MA'AM. THIS THIS GIVES US THE AUTHORITY TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY TO DO THE CONSTRUCTION. THANK YOU, MISS MUELLER. SO, BRANT WILL THERE I KNOW THERE'S A WASH STATION. WILL THERE ALSO BE WATER AVAILABLE? BECAUSE THAT'S A BIG ISSUE TODAY? YES. WE'VE GOT THE WATER METER. SHOULD BE ANY TIME NOW TO BE INSTALLED. AND WE HAVE ONE MORE QUOTE LEFT TO GET THE WATER LINE RUN FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE PARK. ALL RIGHT. SO WILL HAVE WATER.
AND THEN IT LOOKED LIKE THERE WERE SOME TREES. OR ARE WE GOING TO PLANT A GOOD NUMBER OF TREES OR HOW MANY TREES AND WHERE WILL THEY BE LOCATED. SO WE WE HAVE TO BE CAREFUL.
CERTAINLY UNDER THE OVERHEAD POWER LINES THAT ARE DOWN THERE, WE DID PLANT SEVERAL TREES ALONG THE NEW WHERE WE DID THE GRADING AND REDIRECTED THE CHANNEL THAT'S OUTSIDE OF THE DOG PARK. WE PLANTED THAT UP, AND THAT'S KIND OF THE ONLY AREA WE CAN PLANT IN. WE DO HAVE TO MAINTAIN AN AREA THROUGH THE DOG PARK THAT REMAINS OPEN, BECAUSE AT SOME POINT THEY MAY HAVE TO BRING IN LARGE EQUIPMENT TO ACCESS THE OVERHEAD LINES. SO WE DO HAVE TO HAVE CLEAR ZONES WITHIN THE PARK ITSELF TO SO MINIMAL PLANTING. THE SHADE STRUCTURES ARE REALLY GOING TO BE NEEDED BECAUSE IT'S, YOU KNOW, IT GETS REALLY HOT THERE. YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. MR. PAULSON THANK YOU MAYOR. SO GEORGIA POWER HAD TO REREVIEW THE DESIGN BECAUSE OF THESE CONDUCTIVE MATERIALS. DO WE HAVE TO DO ANYTHING TO THE DESIGN OR TO HAVE TO CHANGE ANYTHING? NO. IT BASICALLY JUST MAKES US RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONDUCTIVE MATERIAL. THERE'S ALREADY CONDUCTIVE MATERIAL THERE. NOW YOU HAVE THE CHAIN LINK FENCE. WE HAVE A SHADE AWNING STRUCTURE THERE, THOSE METAL POLES. BUT THEY JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE WERE AWARE THAT WE'RE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANYTHING THAT WE INSTALL ON THE PROPERTY.
FAIR ENOUGH. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING? NONE. WE'LL CALL THE QUESTION. THE
[00:35:01]
QUESTION IS ON AGENDA ITEM 2025 253, AUTHORIZING A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN GEORGIA POWER AND THE CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT LAND LOT 74, 17TH DISTRICT, DESCRIBED MORE PARTICULARLY IN THE ORIGINAL LEASE. ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? NO. THE ITEM IS APPROVED. THE CLERK WILL PLEASE READ THE NEXT ITEM. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2025 254. CONSIDERATION TO DECLARE CITY OWNED REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN LAND LOT 93 OF THE 17TH DISTRICT, FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA. MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 4865 KITTYHAWK DRIVE AS SURPLUS AND TO AUTHORIZE THE THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR SEALED BIDS FOR THE SALE OF SAID PROPERTY AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. PRESENTED BY CITY ATTORNEY DAN LEE. MR. LEE, THANK YOU. COUNCIL. THE CITY OWNS BY WAY OF A DEED FROM DECEMBER OF 2008, APPROXIMATELY A LITTLE MORE THAN 10% OF AN ACRE AT THE INTERSECTION OF KITTY HAWK AND LONG ISLAND DRIVE. THE STAFF BELIEVES THAT THIS IS SURPLUS HAS NO BENEFIT TO THE TO THE CITY, AND UNDER GEORGIA LAW, IN ORDER TO POTENTIALLY SELL, IT HAS TO BE DECLARED BY THE ULTIMATE DECIDERS THAT BE YOU, THAT IT IS SURPLUS PROPERTY. AND THE RECOMMENDATION BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS THAT IT BE DECLARED SURPLUS PROPERTY AND PLACED OUT FOR BID TO SEE WHAT COULD COME OF IT. ALL RIGHT. YOU'VE HEARD THE REPORT OF THE CITY ATTORNEY. WHAT'S THE DESIRE OF COUNCIL? MR. PAULSON? HANG ON, I MOVE. APPROVAL OF AGENDA ITEM 2025 254 TO DECLARE CITY OWNED REAL PROPERTY LOCATED LAND LOT 93, 17TH DISTRICT, FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA. MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 4865 KITTYHAWK DRIVE AS SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZED ADVERTISEMENT FOR SEALED BIDS FOR THE SALE OF SAID PROPERTY AND OTHER PURPOSES. HAVE A MOTION BY MR. PAULSON. IS THERE A SECOND MOTION BY MR. PAULSON, SECONDED BY MR. DEGIULIO, THAT WE APPROVE? AGENDA ITEM 2025 254 TO DECLARE CITY OWNED REAL ESTATE PROPERTY LOCATED AT LAND LOT 93, 17TH DISTRICT, FULTON COUNTY, MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE 4865 KITTYHAWK DRIVE, IS SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT OF SEALED BIDS FOR SALE. ANY DISCUSSION? MAYOR PAUL? MR. PAULSON, DO WE HAVE AN ESTIMATE OF WHAT THE VALUE OF THIS PROPERTY IS? YES, SIR.CAN YOU. IT WOULDN'T BE APPROPRIATE TO TALK ABOUT IT IN AN OPEN MEETING. YOU'RE RIGHT.
THANK YOU. THE MOTION BEFORE YOU IS TO DECLARE IT SURPLUS. I WOULD REMIND YOU THAT YOU'RE SITTING AS PROPERTY OWNERS AND YOU'RE TRYING TO FIND THE BEST PRICE. IF IN FACT, YOU DECLARE IT SURPLUS, THE BEST PRICE FOR THE THE PEOPLE OF SANDY SPRINGS. SO IT WOULD NOT BE APPROPRIATE TO TALK ABOUT IT. THIS WAS INITIATED BY AN ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER WHO WANTS TO BUY IT. BUT BECAUSE OF THE RESTRICTIONS OF GEORGIA LAW THAT THE CITY CAN'T GO OUT AND JUST SELL PROPERTY, YOU HAVE TO DECLARE IT SURPLUS OR THE COUNCIL HAS TO VOTE DECLARED SURPLUS, AND THEN A BIDDING PROCESS HAS TO START BEFORE ANY NEGOTIATION COULD HAPPEN. IF IF IN FACT, A BID IS RECEIVED OR BIDS ARE RECEIVED AS THE DECIDER OF THE SALE OF PUBLIC PROPERTY, YOU WOULD HAVE TO THEN VOTE TO DECIDE IF YOU WANTED TO TAKE SOME OFFER THAT CAME FROM THAT SALE. MAYOR MISTER BOWMAN, THEN MISS ROCHELLE. SO I HAVE SOME CONCERN. I MEAN, THIS THIS IS THE PROPERTY THAT DOES ADJOIN LONG ISLAND DRIVE. IT DOES.
IT'S RIGHT IN THE CORNER. I MEAN, IT IS IT IS NOT A POCKET PARK, BUT IT IS SHADED GREEN SPACE THAT I THINK THAT THE COMMUNITY OF WALKERS, IT'S JUST SHADED SPACE. I THINK THIS IS PREMATURE. THERE HASN'T BEEN REALLY ANY PUBLIC HEARING OR PUBLIC VETTING OF THIS THAT I'M AWARE OF UP TO NOW. AND I'D LIKE TO SEE ABOUT TABLING THIS WITH PENDING FURTHER DISCUSSION WITH AREA STAKEHOLDERS, PEOPLE THAT LIVE IN THAT COMMUNITY, BOTH IN THE CHEROKEE PARK AREA AND AND SURROUNDING AREAS. WE WE HAVE VERY LITTLE EXCESS SPACE. I DON'T I DON'T REALLY HAVE ENOUGH DETAIL ON THIS AT THIS POINT. SO I'D LIKE TO OFFER AN AMENDMENT TO OR I'D LIKE TO SEE IF I CAN MAKE A MOTION TO TABLE. A MOTION TO TABLE IS ALWAYS AN ORDER. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO TABLE THIS JUST LIKE TABLE A SECOND. I'LL SECOND. MOTION BY. BY MR. BAUMAN, SECONDED BY DOCTOR KELLEY THAT WE TABLE AGENDA ITEM 2025 254. ANY DISCUSSION MAYOR PAUL? YES. JUST AGAIN TO TABLE THIS WE ARE REACHING ALSO THE END OF A A COUNCIL AND MAYOR TERM. THIS IS A NON-URGENT MATTER. I'D LIKE TO SEE THIS PUSHED OFF AT LEAST FOR, YOU KNOW, A COUPLE OF MONTHS WHILE THE COMMUNITY GETS TO WEIGH IN ON THIS TO REALLY THINK THROUGH. ALSO OUR POLICY OF DEALING WITH SURPLUS PROPERTY. I DON'T KNOW WHERE ELSE THIS IS RELEVANT AROUND THE CITY. WE'RE SETTING A PRECEDENT. SO I THINK THIS THIS JUST SHOULD BE TABLED FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION, BOTH IN THE SPECIFIC INSTANCE AND ALSO FOR THE CITYWIDE RAMIFICATIONS. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION TO TABLE. ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE. OPPOSED? NO. THE ITEM THE ITEM IS TABLED.
[00:40:08]
CLERK WILL PLEASE READ THE NEXT ITEM. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2025 255. THIS IS CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO QUITCLAIM DEED PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE SANDY SPRINGS HISTORIC SITE AND PARK.THAT'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER 17 00890110476. AND TAX PARCEL ID 1708 90110484 TO THE CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY. THIS IS PRESENTED BY DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CHRIS BURNETT. MR. BURNETT MAYOR AND COUNCIL. THIS IS A PRELIMINARY ITEM TO WHAT YOU ALL WILL HEAR SHORTLY IN THE UPCOMING PFA. IT RELATES TO THE WILLIAMS PAYNE PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT PROPERTY TO THAT THAT WAS ACQUIRED BY THE CITY FROM THE COUNTY IN 2006. AND WE AT THE TIME IT WAS ACQUIRED IN THE CITY'S NAME. AND THE REASON THAT WE'RE ASKING YOU TO APPROVE THIS CONVEYANCE TONIGHT TO THE PFA IS BECAUSE UNDER STATE CODE, I BELIEVE IT'S 36, 60, 13 STATES CAN ENTER INTO LONG TERM LEASE AGREEMENTS, BUT ONLY SO LONG AS THEY HAVE AN ANNUAL MATURITY OR ANNUAL EXPIRATION DATE WITHIN THEIR LEASES. AND GIVEN WHAT YOU'LL HEAR ABOUT IN THE PFA MEETING RELATING TO THE CITY'S GOALS OF LEASING THE WILLIAMS PAYNE HOUSE, AN ANNUAL LEASE MATURITY WOULD NOT WORK IN THAT CASE. SO WE ARE PROPOSING TO APPROVE THE CONVEYANCE VIA QUITCLAIM OF THE WILLIAMS PAYNE PROPERTY TO THE PFA, SO THEN THE PFA CAN ENTER INTO LEASE NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE POTENTIAL TENANT. YOU'VE HEARD THE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. WHAT'S THE DESIRE OF COUNCIL MAYOR PAUL? MISS MUELLER, I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE. AGENDA ITEM 2025 255 A RESOLUTION TO QUITCLAIM DEED PROPERTY KNOWN AS SANDY SPRINGS HISTORIC SITE AND PARK TAX PARCEL NUMBER 17 089, DOUBLE ZERO 11 0476 AND TAX TAX PARCEL NUMBER 17 089011084842. THE CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS PUBLIC FACILITY AUTHORITY HAVE A MOTION BY MISS MUELLER. IS THERE A SECOND SECOND MOTION BY MISS MUELLER, SECONDED BY MISS ROCHELLE. EXCUSE ME THAT WE APPROVE. AGENDA ITEM 2025 255 A RESOLUTION TO QUITCLAIM DEED PROPERTY KNOWN AS SANDY SPRINGS HISTORIC SITE PARCEL LISTED IN THE THE THE AGENDA. ANY DISCUSSION, MR. DEGIULIO? DOES THIS INCLUDE THE ENTIRE THE ENTIRETY OF THE HISTORIC SITE, THE HOUSE, THE BAND SHELTER, THE THE OLD HERITAGE BUILDING, THAT WHOLE BLOCK? OR IS THIS JUST JUST WHERE THE WILLIAM PAYNE HOUSE IS? SO THERE ARE TWO PARCELS. ONE IS THE WHERE THE WILLIAMS PAYNE HOUSE IS LOCATED AND THE OTHER IS THE SMALL ADJACENT PARK WHERE THE GAZEBO. THERE'S A FIRE PIT THERE AS WELL, WALKING TRAILS THAT. BUT IT DOES NOT INCLUDE THE HERITAGE GREEN NOR THE HERITAGE BUILDING OR ANY OTHER SITES. THERE WERE SIX PARCELS IN TOTAL AT ONE TIME. THESE ARE ONLY TWO OF THOSE SIX PARCELS.
I BELIEVE IT'S CORRECT. THE OTHERS WILL REMAIN IN THE CITY'S NAME. ACTUALLY NOT TO CORRECT YOU, CHRIS, BUT IT DOES INCLUDE HERITAGE GREEN. IT DOES NOT INCLUDE HERITAGE AMPHITHEATER. NOW, WHAT YOU'RE BEING ASKED IN THIS DECISION IS TO IS TO QUIT. CLAIM THE TWO PARCELS OUTLINED IN BLUE ON THE SCREEN IN FRONT OF YOU TO THE PFA. WE ARE NOT CONTEMPLATING THAT THE TENANT WILL HAVE A LEASE TO THE LARGER PARCEL THAT SAYS 109 HILDEBRAND, WHICH IS THE HERITAGE GREEN. THEY'LL ONLY HAVE A LEASE TO 6075 SANDY SPRINGS CIRCLE. BUT YOU'RE BEING ASKED TO CONVEY BOTH OF THESE TO THE PFA AT THIS TIME. YEAH. YOU GOT THE FLOOR. THE FLOOR. SINCE SINCE THIS AREA IS PART OF WHAT WE'VE CONSIDERED FOR CITY SPRINGS TWO. AND SINCE WE'RE DOING IT ANYWAY, AND SINCE IT ALL BELONGS TO THE CITY, EVEN THE ACTUAL SPRING, AS IS PARCEL, IS LOCATED ON THIS PROPERTY, THE ACTUAL SANDY SPRINGS. WHY AREN'T WE JUST DOING THE WHOLE THING? WE CAN, IF YOU WANT TO THE THE THOUGHT PROCESS THAT WE HAD AS STAFF, BECAUSE COUNCIL HAD BEEN INSISTENT THAT WE WOULD NOT BE DOING ANYTHING TO TAKE AWAY FROM WHAT THE SPRING WOULD BE. IT WOULD NOT BE REDEVELOPED, SO TO SPEAK, AND NEITHER WOULD THE GREEN WHERE THE AMPHITHEATER IS. BUT IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADD THE AMPHITHEATER AND HERITAGE BUILDING TO IT, WE CAN CERTAINLY CHANGE THAT. I JUST DON'T SEE WHY IT WOULD NOT INCLUDE THAT, TO BE HONEST WITH YOU. SHOULD I MAKE AN AMENDMENT TO INCLUDE THE MAYOR? IF I
[00:45:01]
COULD LET LET'S LET THE CITY ATTORNEY OPINE. ONE OTHER POINT I THINK YOU OUGHT TO CONSIDER IS THAT ALL THIS PROPERTY, AS YOU WILL REMEMBER MORE THAN ANYBODY, CAME IN FROM FULTON COUNTY. AND BELIEVE IT OR NOT, IT'S NEVER BEEN SURVEYED. SO A SURVEY HAS BEEN ORDERED. AND WHAT WHAT CHRIS, IS, I THINK ASKING YOU TONIGHT IS TO IDENTIFY AN AREA WHERE THE SURVEY WILL FALL, THAT WILL BE THE LEASED PROPERTY THAT EVENTUALLY WOULD BE ATTACHED TO THE LEASE, THAT LEASE AS THE SMALLEST, THE LEAST AS IN A LEASE? YES. THE LEASE THE CORRECT THE LEASED PROPERTY WILL BE IDENTIFIED IN THE SURVEY THAT IS BEING CONDUCTED RIGHT NOW. AND WHAT HE'S BRINGING TO YOU TONIGHT IS A WAY TO GET IT OVER INTO THE PUBLIC FACILITY. SO WE DON'T SLOW DOWN THE LEASE ARRANGEMENT WITH THE TENANT. OKAY. BUT BUT THE MORE SPECIFIC DIAGRAM VIA THE LEASE WILL COME BACK TO THE COUNCIL. ARE WE HAVING THE ENTIRE PARCEL SURVEYED OR JUST THESE TWO PARCELS? JUST THE THE PROPERTY THAT WOULD BE LEASED OUT OF THAT, THE ONES THAT THAT CHRIS HAS IDENTIFIED, JUST THAT PART IS BEING SURVEYED. THE REST OF IT IS NOT BEING SURVEYED. THAT'S RIGHT. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. WE'LL CALL THE QUESTION. THE QUESTION IS ON AGENDA ITEM 2025 255. A RESOLUTION TO QUITCLAIM DEED PROPERTY KNOWN AS SANDY SPRINGS HISTORIC SITE AND PARK TAX PARCELS LISTED IN THE AGENDA TO THE CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY.ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION? SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? NO. THE ITEM IS APPROVED. MOVING TO REPORTS,
[X. Reports]
FOLKS. I YOU KNOW, I THINK THAT OUR 20TH ANNIVERSARY GALA WAS WAS VERY GOOD SUCCESS. THEY THE FOUNDATION RAISED MONEY FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER. THEY'RE STILL DOING THE ACCOUNTING AND BALANCING. WE'RE NOT EXACTLY SURE HOW MUCH THEY'VE RAISED, BUT WE SHOULD HAVE THAT VERY SOON. WE'LL HOPEFULLY BE ABLE TO REPORT THAT TO COUNCIL VERY SOON. WE JUST HAD THE OCTOBER FEAST THIS WEEKEND. ANOTHER VERY WELL ATTENDED EVENT, AND THEN A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT I PARTICIPATED IN. I PRESIDED OVER THE METRO ATLANTA MAYOR'S ASSOCIATION, WHERE WE HAD A VERY BROAD DISCUSSION ABOUT THE WORLD CUP, TALKING ABOUT ALL THE PLANS AND PREPARATIONS.IT'S GOING TO BE AN EXCITING TIME FOR THE METRO ATLANTA AREA. THEY MADE VERY CLEAR THAT THEY DIDN'T WANT EVERYBODY IN DOWNTOWN ATLANTA. THEY WANT TO SPREAD THEM OUT ACROSS THE ENTIRE REGION. SO OUR VISIT, SANDY SPRINGS AND THE PERFORMING ARTS TEAM ARE WORKING TOGETHER TO COME UP WITH SOME IDEAS HOW WE CAN HOST SOME SOME EVENTS OUT HERE ON THE GREEN AND MAYBE IN USE SOME CORPORATE ACTIVITY IN IN THE CONFERENCE CENTER. AND THEN THE LAST THING WAS TODAY, I WAS ABLE I WAS HONORED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE ATLANTA JEWISH ACADEMY'S COMMEMORATION OF THE OCTOBER 7TH EVENT OR TRAGEDY. AND SO VERY THE KIDS PUT ON A VERY, VERY, VERY MOVING PERFORMANCE TODAY, RECOUNTING ALL THE EVENTS AROUND OCTOBER 7TH. THAT'S IT FOR ME. ANYBODY ELSE, MR. BAUMANN? SO, MAYOR PAUL, THANK YOU FOR THE UPDATE. WE HAVE A LOT PLANNED FOR CITY GREEN AND OUR CITY CENTER AREA DUE TO SORT OF THE TIMES THAT WE'RE IN. I JUST WANT TO LEAVE THIS AND THROW THIS OUT THERE FOR THE PLANNING. THIS MAY BE REALLY THE LAST TIME OR NOT, THAT I HAVE A CHANCE TO SAY THIS PUBLICLY, BUT WE NEED TO SEE MORE PROGRAMING AROUND THE CITY AND THE IDEA OF MORE EVENTS ON OUR CITY. GREEN, WHILE MAYBE APPEALING, IS NOT, IN MY VIEW, IN THE BEST INTEREST NECESSARILY, OF THE CITY THAT I HAVE HEARD FROM FOLKS. IN FACT, I'VE HAD THIS VERY CONVERSATION WITH OWNERS OF PROPERTY ON THE NORTH OF ABERNATHY, NORTH OF DALRYMPLE. IN FACT, IN REGARDS TO THE WORLD CUP. SO I WOULD LIKE TO ASK THAT THE CITY NOW AND AND IN ITS PLANNING, KEEP AN OPEN MIND TO LOCATIONS THAT ARE NOT JUST IN OUR CITY GREEN, BUT IN OTHER PARTS OF THE CITY WHERE FOLKS WANT TO FEEL INCLUDED IN OUR EVENTS. THAT COULD INCLUDE MAYBE SOME OF THE UNDERUTILIZED SHOPPING CENTERS NORTH OF OF DALRYMPLE WHERE WE COULD DO TENTED EVENTS. BUT I WOULD JUST ASK THAT THE CITY STAFF, EDEN AND THIS COUNCIL, FUTURE COUNCILS, CONSIDER WHETHER THERE ARE OPTIONS OUTSIDE OF THE CITY GREEN FOR THE PROGRAMING THAT WE DO AS A COMMUNITY AND SPEND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS ON SOME OF THAT NEEDS TO BE SPREAD TO OTHER PARTS.
THANK YOU, MR. PAULSON. THANK YOU. MAYOR. MAYOR, YOU MENTIONED THE CELEBRATION OF TWO WEEKS, TWO WEEKS AGO, A WEEK AND A HALF AGO, AND WE HAD THE BIG TENT OUT ON THE LAWN
[00:50:04]
AND THE BIG TENT STAYED UP FOR OKTOBERFEST THIS PAST WEEKEND, WHICH I THOUGHT WAS A PRETTY GOOD IDEA. AND IT HELPED. AND THEN I NOTICED IT'S OUT THERE TODAY AND IT'S BEING USED FOR THE EVENT TODAY. SO IT'S PRETTY INTERESTING. IT'S THIS THIS TENT OF THIS SIZE. IS THIS OF INTEREST IN THE CITY POTENTIALLY ACQUIRING THIS, OR ARE WE BETTER OFF JUST RENTING IT OR AND IF WE'RE GOING TO DO EVENTS IN SHOPPING CENTERS UP IN THE NORTH END, AS COUNCILMAN BAUM IS SAYING, MAYBE TENT LIKE THIS, MAYBE NOT QUITE THIS BIG, BUT MAYBE A TENT LIKE THIS MIGHT BE WORTH IT. I DON'T KNOW THE THE COST OF THESE THINGS, BUT IT SURE WORKED WELL FOR THESE THREE EVENTS THAT WE HAPPEN TO HAVE. AND THAT IS SOMETHING THAT I'VE ALREADY TASKED DAVE AND BILL WITH. LOOKING AT BILL FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF IF WE HAVE ENOUGH DEMAND FOR RENTAL OPPORTUNITIES TO USE IT, BECAUSE I DO NOT ANTICIPATE THAT WE WOULD AS THE CITY, BECAUSE A TENT THAT SIZE, THE RENT WAS OVER $30,000. SO A BUYING ONE OF THOSE TENTS IS GOING TO BE VERY EXPENSIVE, NOT TO MENTION THE COST OF STORING IT. I DID NOT REALIZE, BUT THE TRUSS IS ONE SOLID PIECE. IT IS NOT PUT TOGETHER. THIS IS ALL ONE. SO TO BE ABLE TO HAVE THAT SOMEWHERE, IT IS DEFINITELY SOMETHING WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT EVER SINCE IT FIRST CAME IN, BUT IT WILL BE GOING DOWN TOMORROW. WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO SPREAD THAT COST OVER THREE EVENTS. SO THAT WAS MADE. IT MADE IT COST EFFECTIVE. SO ANY OTHER OKAY, MISS CARLISLE MONEY. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. THIS IS THE REVIEW FOR THE AUGUST 2025 UNAUDITED FINANCIALS. ON PAGE ONE. WE ARE AT 16.67% OF THIS FISCAL YEAR.REVENUES ARE AT 4.72%, AND EXPENDITURES ARE AT CUMULATIVELY 15.16% OF THE BUDGET. WE'RE STARTING TO SEE A FEW A LITTLE BIT MORE ACTIVITY IN THE REVENUE SECTION, AS MANY OF THE TAX REVENUES ARE RECEIVED IN SUBSEQUENT MONTHS OR QUARTERS. THE EXPENDITURES FOR THE DEPARTMENTS ARE SHOWN ON PAGES NINE THROUGH 28. OVERALL, THE OPERATING EXPENSES ARE AT 15.6% AND ARE BEING EXPENDED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED BUDGET. THE REMAINING PAGES COVER THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND, CAPITAL PROJECTS, DEBT SERVICE AND ENTERPRISE FUNDS FOR YOUR REVIEW, AND THIS DOES CONCLUDE THE REVIEW FOR AUGUST 2025. UNAUDITED FINANCIAL REPORT. ANY QUESTIONS OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER ABOUT THE THE FINANCIAL REPORT? ALL RIGHT. HEARING NONE. THAT BRINGS US TO THE END. MR. DEGIULIO. HANG ON, MAYOR PAUL.
DO WE HAVE AN EXECUTIVE SESSION TONIGHT? NO, WE DON'T. WE OKAY. IT'S ON HERE. THAT AT THE BEGINNING, MR. DEGIULIO MOVES ADJOURNMENT. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. MOTION BY MR. DEGIULIO, SECONDED BY MR. PAULSON, THAT WE ADJOURN THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING. BUT DON'T GO ANYWHERE.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? NO. COUNCIL MEETING IS ADJOURNED. BUT WE ARE NOW
[Additional Item]
MOVING TO THE PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY. LET ME FINISH MY PAPERWORK. I WOULD LIKE TO CALL THIS SPECIAL MEETING OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY TO ORDER FOR TUESDAY, OCTOBER 21ST.WILL THE CITY CLERK PLEASE CALL THE ROLL AND MAKE THE GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS FIRST? I'D JUST LIKE TO BEGIN BY REMINDING EVERYBODY IN ATTENDANCE TO SILENCE THOSE CELL PHONES AND OTHER ELECTRONIC DEVICES. AS I CALL ROLL. PLEASE CONFIRM YOUR ATTENDANCE CHAIR, RUSTY PAUL, PRESENT MEMBER JOHN PAULSON. MEMBER. MELODY KELLY. MEMBER. MELISSA MUELLER. HERE. MEMBER.
JODY. ROCHELLE. EXCUSE ME. MEMBER. TIBBE DEGIULIO. MEMBER ANDY BAUMAN HERE. IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MEETING AGENDA? MR. DEGIULIO. MOVE. APPROVAL OF THE MEETING AGENDA FOR THE SPECIAL CALLED MEETING OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY. TUESDAY, OCTOBER 21ST, 2025. IS THERE A SECOND SECOND MOTION BY MR. DEGIULIO, SECONDED BY MR. PAULSON, THAT WE APPROVE THE MEETING AGENDA? IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. WE'LL CALL THE QUESTION. THE QUESTION IS ON APPROVAL OF THE MEETING AGENDA. ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION? SAY AYE. OPPOSED? NO. THE MEETING AGENDA IS APPROVED. IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MEETING MINUTES? MISS ROCHELLE, I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THE MEETING MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 16TH, 2025. WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. ROCHELLE. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND? IS THAT DOCTOR KELLY OR MISS MUELLER? OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION BY MISS ROCHELLE SECONDED BY MR. MUELLER TO APPROVE THE MEETING MINUTES. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. WE'LL CALL THE QUESTION.
THE QUESTION IS ON APPROVAL OF THE MEETING MINUTES. ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION? SAY AYE.
OPPOSED. NO MEETING MINUTES ARE APPROVED. MOVING TO NEW BUSINESS. WILL THE SECRETARY PLEASE READ THE FIRST ITEM? THIS IS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FOR 20 2520. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONTRACT WITH HUSSEY, GAY BELL AND DEYOUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC.
FOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE NEW FIRE STATIONS NUMBER ONE AND FOUR AND RENOVATIONS TO FIRE STATION NUMBER THREE AND AUTHORIZATION FOR THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT PRESENTED BY A FACILITIES AND OPERATIONS DIRECTOR, DAVE WELLS.
MR. WELLS, GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. IN JULY, THE CITY INITIATED A COMPETITIVE
[00:55:04]
QUALIFICATIONS BASED SOLICITATION TO CHOOSE AN ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING FIRM FOR THREE FIRE STATION PROJECTS TWO NEW FIRE STATIONS. FIRE STATION, ONE FOR AND THE RENOVATION OF FIRE STATION THREE. WE SAW SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRY INTEREST, RECEIVING PROPOSALS FROM 17 FIRMS. AFTER AN INITIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE, ONE FIRM WAS DEEMED NON-RESPONSIVE. AN EVALUATION COMMITTEE, INCLUDING CHIEF SANDERS, MYSELF, AND RICHARD COLLINS, THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER, THEN INDEPENDENTLY REVIEWED EACH SUBMISSION. THE SCORING WAS BASED ON THE FIRM'S EXPERIENCE, TEAMS QUALITY AND PROJECT DELIVERY, EACH ACCOUNTING FOR 25% OF THE SCORE, AS WELL AS THE APPROACH AND INNOVATION AT 15% AND FINANCIAL STABILITY AT 10%. AFTER THOROUGH EVALUATION, THE TOP THREE RANKED FIRMS CROFT AND ASSOCIATES, HUSSEY, GAY BELL AND DEYOUNG, AND P.O.W ARCHITECTS WERE INVITED FOR INTERVIEWS AND PRESENTATIONS WHERE THEY DISCUSSED THEIR TEAM'S QUALITY, PROJECT APPROACH AND PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE. THE COMMITTEE THEN AGREED THAT HUSSEY, GAY, BELL AND DEYOUNG WAS THE MOST QUALIFIED, FOLLOWED BY CROFT ASSOCIATES AND THEN POE W. WE THEN REVIEWED THREE PROPOSALS, ALTHOUGH CROFT ASSOCIATES SUBMITTED A PROPOSAL OFFERING AN ARCHITECTURAL FEE CALCULATED AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL COST CONSTRUCTION COSTS. THIS APPROACH INTRODUCES SIGNIFICANT UNCERTAINTY RELATIVE TO THE CITY'S OVERALL BUDGET MANAGEMENT AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT NEEDS. BECAUSE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST CANNOT BE DETERMINED UNTIL DESIGN IS COMPLETE AND PROJECT IS BID, THE ACTUAL COMPENSATION UNDER A PERCENTAGE BASED AGREEMENT COULD NOT BE CONFIRMED OR CAPPED AT THIS TIME. THIS POSES A RISK OF COST ESCALATIONS TO THE CITY AND PROVIDES NO DEFINED, NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT FOR BUDGET PROPOSALS TO CONTRAST HUSSEY, BOTH HUSSEY, GAY BELL, DEYOUNG AND POE PROPOSED FIXED FEE STRUCTURES WITH CLEARLY DEFINED NOT TO EXCEED VALUE THAT PROVIDES A GREATER COST PREDICTABILITY AND FINANCIAL CONTROL DURING BOTH DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PHASES. THE FIXED FEE APPROACH ALIGNS THE CITY'S PROCUREMENT OBJECTIVE OF AWARDING CONTRACTS ON A KNOWN AND CONTROLLABLE COST BASIS, AND THEREFORE RECOMMENDED FOR AWARD. POE PROPOSED A BASE FEE OF $1,865,300, WITH SEVERAL EMBEDDED INCLUSIONS IN THEIR PRICING, INCLUDING F.F.A SPECIAL EQUIPMENT SUCH AS AV MATERIAL, TESTING, SITE AND UTILITY SURVEYS, AND COST ESTIMATING BEYOND 65% DESIGN.THEY ALSO RESERVED THE RIGHT TO ADJUST FEES UPWARD IF ALL THE PROJECTS WERE NOT DESIGNED CONCURRENTLY. THEIR PRICING ASSUMES THAT THE FIRE STATIONS ONE AND FOUR WILL BE DESIGNED AS PROTOTYPICAL FACILITIES. HUSSEY GAY BELL PROPOSED A FEE OF $2,108,780. DESPITE THE HIGHER COST, THEIR PROPOSAL REPRESENTED THE BEST OVERALL DUE TO THE EXTENSIVE PUBLIC SAFETY EXPERIENCE, PROVEN TEAM DEPTH, AND STRONG COMMITMENT TO COMMITMENT. ENGAGEMENT. TO DATE, HUSSEY GAY BELL HAS COMPLETED OVER 40 FIRE STATIONS, WHICH INCLUDES FIRE STATION TWO AND FIVE. THEIR TEAM INCLUDES 175 PROFESSIONALS ACROSS 12 DISCIPLINES, AND THE PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE HAS COMMITTED TO DEDICATING 50% OF HIS TIME TO THESE PROJECTS. THEIR PROACTIVE APPROACH INCLUDES LISTEN AND LEARN, ARE LISTENING FIRST WORKSHOPS AND REGULAR COMMUNICATION WITH BOTH CITY STAFF AND THE COMMUNITY, ENSURING CONCERNS LIKE TRAFFIC, NOISE AND PROPERTY IMPACTS ARE ADDRESSED BASED ON THEIR PROVEN TRACK RECORD. COMPREHENSIVE UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT REQUIREMENTS AND THOROUGH PROPOSAL. THE EVALUATION COMMITTEE UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS AWARDING THE DESIGN CONTRACT FOR FIRE STATIONS ONE, THREE, AND FOUR TO HUSSEY GAY, BELL DEYOUNG. THEREFORE, IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED THAT THE PUBLIC FACILITY AUTHORITY APPROVES A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT WITH HUSSEY GAY BELL DEYOUNG, INC. FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE NEW FIRE STATIONS NUMBER ONE AND NUMBER FOUR, AS WELL AS THE RENOVATIONS OF FIRE STATION NUMBER THREE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. YOU'VE HEARD THE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF FACILITIES, CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING OPERATIONS. WHAT'S THE DESIRE OF COUNCIL MAYOR PAUL? MR. PAULSON, I MOVE APPROVAL OF AGENDA. AGENDA ITEM FOR 20 2520.
[01:00:01]
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONTRACT WITH HUSSEY, GAY BELL AND DEYOUNG INTERNATIONAL FOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE NEW FIRE STATIONS ONE FOUR AND RENOVATION OF FIRE STATION THREE. AN AUTHORIZATION FOR THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT. WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. PAULSON. IS THERE A SECOND MOTION BY MR. PAULSON, SECONDED BY MR. DEGIULIO, THAT WE APPROVE? AGENDA ITEM 2025 DASH 20 RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRACT WITH HUSSEY, GAY BELL AND DEYOUNG INTERNATIONAL FOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE NEW FIRE STATIONS ONE FOUR AND RENOVATIONS TO STATION NUMBER THREE. ANY DISCUSSION? MAYOR PAUL? MR. PAULSON, ASSUMING WE APPROVE THIS TONIGHT, WHEN DOES ALL THIS GET STARTED? AS SOON AS WE GET THAT CONTRACT SIGNED, WE WILL KICK IT OFF. WE'RE HOPING BY HOPEFULLY BY THE END OF NOVEMBER, EARLY DECEMBER. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION, MISS ROCHELLE? DID THEY ALSO DO THE DESIGN FOR TWO AND FIVE? THEY DID. AND WERE THERE ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE TO THE QUOTE OR TO THE AGREEMENT DURING THOSE TIMES? AMENDMENTS TO THE.DO YOU MEAN CHANGE ORDERS? YEAH. CHANGE ORDERS. THAT'S WHAT I MEANT. CHANGE. NO, THERE WERE NO CHANGE ORDERS THERE OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANKS. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. WE'LL CALL THE QUESTION. THE QUESTION IS ON AGENDA ITEM 20 OR EXCUSE ME FOR 2025 DASH 20, A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRACT WITH HUSSEY, GAY BELL AND DEYOUNG FOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR NEW FIRE STATIONS. ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION? SAY AYE.
AYE. OPPOSED? NO. THE ITEM IS APPROVED. THE SECRETARY, PLEASE READ THE NEXT ITEM FOR THIS IS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER PFA 20 2521. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT A QUITCLAIM DEED FOR THE CITY OF SANDY FROM THE CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE SANDY SPRINGS HISTORIC SITE AND PARK. THAT'S TAX PARCEL ID NUMBER 17 08900110476. IN TAX PARCEL ID NUMBER 17 008900110484. PRESENTED BY DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CHRIS BURNETT. MR. BURNETT MR. CHAIRMAN THE PFA MEMBERS, THIS IS A CONTINUATION OF THE CONVERSATION WE HAD IN COUNCIL REGARDING THE TRANSFER OF TITLE TO THE WILLIAMS PAYNE HOUSE PROPERTIES FROM THE CITY TO THE PFA SO THAT WE CAN THEN DISCUSS THE NEXT ITEM, WHICH IS THE LEASE AGREEMENT THAT'S PROPOSED. SO WE'RE ASKING YOU, WE'RE ASKING YOU AS PFA MEMBERS TO ACCEPT THAT PROPERTY AS OWNERSHIP BY THE PFA FROM THE CITY. I'VE HEARD THE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. WHAT'S THE DESIRE OF COUNCIL, MISS MUELLER? I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE. AGENDA ITEM PFA 2025 DASH 21 A RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT A QUITCLAIM DEED FROM THE CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE SANDY SPRINGS HISTORIC SITE AND PARK TAX PARCEL NUMBER 17 0890 11 0476 AND TAX PARCEL NUMBER 17 DASH 009, DOUBLE ZERO 11 048-4 HAVE A MOTION BY MISS MUELLER. IS THERE A SECOND SECOND MOTION BY MISS MUELLER SECONDED BY MISS ROCHELLE THAT WE APPROVE AGENDA FOR 20 2521 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A QUITCLAIM DEED FROM THE CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS FOR THE SITE KNOWN AS SANDY SPRINGS HISTORIC SITE AND PARK. ANY DISCUSSION? MR. DEGIULIO DAN, I HAVE ONE QUESTION. WHEN THESE PROPERTIES WERE PURCHASED IN 2006, I BELIEVE IT WAS WHEN THEY WERE TRANSFERRED FROM FULTON COUNTY TO THE CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS. WERE THERE ANY COVENANTS IN THOSE AGREEMENTS THAT. ABOUT THE TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP AGAIN? AND IF SO, WOULD TRANSFERRING IT FROM THE CITY TO THE PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY KICK ANY OF THAT STUFF OFF? IT WOULD NOT. AND GENERALLY THAT THE COVENANT WOULD HAVE TO DO WITH PUBLIC USE, AND THE PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY WOULD FULFILL THAT COVENANT. THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING? NONE. WE'LL CALL THE QUESTION. THE QUESTION IS ON FOR 20 2521 RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT A QUITCLAIM DEED FROM THE CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS SANDY SPRINGS HISTORIC SITE AND PARK. ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION? SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? NO. EXCUSE ME.
THE ITEM IS APPROVED. CLARK, THE SECRETARY. PLEASE READ THE NEXT ITEM. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FOR 20 2522. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY GENERAL MANAGER AND THE CITY ATTORNEY TO NEGOTIATE A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH SUMMIT SANDY SPRINGS, LLC, AND TO AUTHORIZE THE AUTHORITY'S GENERAL MANAGER, THE AUTHORITY GENERAL MANAGER, TO EXECUTE THE LEASE AGREEMENT PRESENTED BY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHRIS BURNETT. MR. BURNETT, THANK YOU. SO NOW THAT THE CITY HAS VOTED TO CONVEY THE PROPERTY TO THE PFA AND THE PFA HAS VOTED TO ACCEPT IT, LET'S TALK ABOUT THE REASONS FOR THIS TRANSACTION, WHICH IS A COMMERCIAL LEASE AGREEMENT FOR THE WILLIAMS PAYNE PROPERTY. GIVE YOU A LITTLE REFRESHER COURSE AND WE'LL TRY TO BE BRIEF, BUT OUR LISTING AND SELECTION PROCESS, I KNOW YOU ALL HAVE BEEN WE'VE BEEN DISCUSSING THIS FOR A WHILE NOW. WE CONDUCTED A RFP
[01:05:07]
PROCESS FOR LISTING AGENTS. THE SHOPPING CENTER GROUP WAS SELECTED TO PRESENT THE CITY IN THE MARKETING OF THE WILLIAMS PAYNE HOUSE TO POTENTIAL TENANTS. MR. ALAN SHAW FROM THE SHOPPING CENTER GROUP IS WITH US TONIGHT. I WANT TO THANK ALAN FOR HIS GREAT WORK IN BRINGING US A REAL MYRIAD OF OF POTENTIAL TENANTS THAT SHOWED INTEREST IN THIS PROPERTY. ALSO WANT TO THANK OUR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST, MADISON MELTON, WHO WORKED VERY CLOSELY WITH ALAN AS WELL THROUGHOUT THIS PROCESS. AND THEY DID AN EXCELLENT JOB OF GETTING US TO THE POINT OF THE DISCUSSIONS WE'RE HAVING TONIGHT, I BELIEVE, ALAN, CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG.THERE WERE OVER 50 INQUIRIES ABOUT THIS PROPERTY. YOU SHOWED IT TO OVER 30 PROSPECTS, AND FROM THAT NARROWED THE LIST DOWN INITIALLY TO SEVEN. SEVEN LETTERS OF INTENT WERE DISTRIBUTED, OF WHICH THAT WAS THREE RESPONSES WERE DISCUSSED AND REVIEWED. AND ONE OF THE MAJOR ISSUES HAS BEEN THE CITY'S OR IN THIS CASE, THE FDA'S RELUCTANCE TO PROVIDE TENANT FINISH DOLLARS, WHAT'S CALLED A TNI ALLOWANCE FROM THE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE WORLD, BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY THE CITY INVESTING MONEY INTO A BUSINESS COULD REPRESENT RISK TO OUR TAXPAYERS. SO IN OUR DISCUSSIONS WITH INTERESTED PARTIES, WE WOULD LET THEM KNOW THAT IT WAS NOT THE DESIRE OF OF OUR COMMUNITY TO INVEST DOLLARS INTO THE T, WHICH WHITTLE THAT DOWN TO THREE. AND FROM THOSE, ALAN AND YOUR STAFF, YOUR TEAM HERE HAVE RECOMMENDED THAT THAT THAT THAT LEASE AGREEMENT BE AWARDED TO SUMMIT SANDY SPRINGS LLC, DOING BUSINESS AS SUMMIT COFFEE. SO WHO IS SUMMIT COFFEE? OPENED ORIGINALLY IN 1998, A GROUP OF YOUNG GENTLEMEN THAT WENT TO DAVIDSON UNIVERSITY. TOGETHER. THEY HAVE GROWN OVER THE YEARS TO 20 LOCATIONS. CURRENTLY THEY ARE IN, I BELIEVE, GOING INTO JOHNS CREEK IN THE MEDLEY DEVELOPMENT WHEN THAT IS COMPLETED. SO THAT WOULD BE NUMBER 21 IN THIS LOCATION. IF YOU ALL ACCEPT, IT WOULD BE LOCATION NUMBER 22. ADAM COOK AND TEAM SUMMIT. IN FACT, ADAM IS WITH US TONIGHT ALONG WITH HIS PARTNER MIKE ANNA BACK HERE. AND YOU GUYS ARE, IF YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK WITH THEM. THEY ARE. BOTH INVOLVED VERY MUCH IN THE DAY TO DAY OPERATIONS. IN FACT, ADAM IS THE GENERAL PARTNER, GENERAL MANAGING PARTNER OF THIS VENTURE, AND THEY BOTH LIVE HERE IN SANDY SPRINGS. SO THEY HAVE VERY, VERY CLOSE ROOTS TO OUR COMMUNITY. AND YOU'LL SEE ADAM'S QUOTE ABOUT NOT JUST THE IMPORTANCE OF SELLING FOOD AND COFFEE AND BEVERAGES, BUT ALSO OF CREATING A SPECIAL PLACE, A DESTINATION FOR OUR COMMUNITY, WHICH WE'VE ALL TALKED ABOUT IS A VERY IMPORTANT PART OF THIS SELECTION PROCESS. THIS IS A QUICK MAP OF SOME OF ITS CURRENT LOCATIONS. BECAUSE THEY WERE BORN OUT OF DAVIDSON UNIVERSITY, THEY BEGAN IN NORTH CAROLINA AND ARE ACROSS THE NORTH CAROLINA CORRIDOR, WHICH IS WHERE THE MAJORITY OF THEIR STORES WOULD BE. NATURALLY, THEY HAVE ALSO MOVED INTO SOUTH CAROLINA, INTO THE CHARLESTON MARKET, AND THEN MOVED INTO THE ATLANTA MARKET IN RECENT YEARS, WITH FOUR LOCATIONS IN ATLANTA CURRENTLY OPEN ROSWELL, CITY OF ROSWELL, BROOKHAVEN, DUNWOODY, AND EMORY VILLAGE. SANDY SPRINGS WOULD BE NUMBER FIVE AND JOHNS CREEK WOULD BE NUMBER SIX. AND SO THEY'VE GOT GOOD OPERATING HISTORY SPANNING ALMOST 27 YEARS AT THIS POINT, FROM THE ORIGINAL STARTUP OF THE ORGANIZATION. SO SUMMIT COFFEE IS A RESTAURANT, INDOOR OUTDOOR SEATING. THERE WOULD BE BOOKABLE SPACE FOR EVENTS IN THE WILLIAMS PAYNE HOUSE, AND ALSO IN SOME OF THE EXTERIOR SPACES ON THE PATIO BEHIND THE BUILDING. STANDARD AND SEASONAL MENUS, I BELIEVE. I THINK YOU SAID ADAM. 7 P.M. 7 A.M. TO 9 P.M. SO IT'LL BE A LONG DAY FOR THEM, SEVEN DAYS A WEEK. THEY'LL PROVIDE BAKING OPERATIONS. THEY'LL ALSO HAVE AN OUTDOOR ALCOHOL BAR. AND THIS IS UNIQUE. THEY HAVE THIS IN ONLY ONE OF THEIR OTHER LOCATIONS. AND THAT'S IN WHAT THEY CALL BASE CAMP, WHICH IS THE ORIGINAL DAVIDSON LOCATION.
AND IT'S THEIR OWN ICE CREAM. IT'S CALLED SUMMIT CREAMERY, AND THEY'LL BE OPERATING OUT OF THE WILLIAMS PAYNE HOUSE AS WELL. AND ONE OF THE THINGS WE'VE TALKED A LOT ABOUT WITH ADAM IS THE ACTIVATION OF THIS FACILITY FOR OUR GARDEN CLUBS AND THE OLD HERITAGE SANDY SPRINGS AND THE THE SANDY SPRINGS SOCIETY. AND AS YOU ALL KNOW, WE ARE A PLETHORA OF NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS AND CITIZENS WHO CARE DEEPLY ABOUT THIS COMMUNITY, AND THEY UNDERSTAND THAT SENSE OF PRIDE AND ENGAGEMENT HERE AND ARE VERY MUCH INTO CREATING THAT SENSE OF PLACE AND WORKING WITH THESE ORGANIZATIONS TO MAKE WILLIAMS PAYNE, TO ASSURE THAT IT CONTINUES TO BE A VERY VIBRANT AND SPECIAL PART OF OUR COMMUNITY. YOU'LL SEE UP THERE OUR LEASE AGREEMENT. WE'LL WE'LL REVIEW THAT IN A LITTLE MORE DETAIL IN JUST A MOMENT.
I'M GOING TO GO QUICKLY THROUGH THIS. THESE ARE SOME INTERIOR SHOTS OF SOME OF THEIR CURRENT LOCATIONS, PLUS SOME OF THE COLOR PATTERNS AND SEATING THAT THEY WILL USE. THEY'VE ALREADY
[01:10:04]
DONE SOME EXTENSIVE PLANNING ON THE FIRST AND SECOND FLOORS OF THE BUILDING. AND IN FACT, DAVE WELLS AND I MET WITH WITH ADAM TODAY TO TALK THROUGH SOME OF THE ISSUES, STRUCTURAL AND OTHER FEATURES OF THE BUILDING THAT WILL BE SENSITIVE TO GIVEN ITS HISTORICAL STATUS. AND I KNOW THAT DOESN'T TELL YOU MUCH RIGHT THERE, BUT AS YOU CAN SEE, THEY'VE DONE A PLAN REVIEWS ALREADY OF HOW THEY WOULD INTEND TO RENOVATE THE SPACE. SO LET'S GET INTO THE FINANCIAL PIECES OF THIS. WE WE'RE PROBABLY LOOKING AT A SIX MONTH PERIOD OF TIME FOR THEM TO RENOVATE THE PROPERTY AND BE READY FOR OPENING. THAT WOULD PUT A TARGET OPENING DATE OF AROUND JUNE 1ST OF 2026. WE'RE LOOKING AT ABATING THE FIRST YEAR OF RENT AND THE YOU KNOW, I'M NOT GOING TO SAY THAT THEY'RE I MEAN, I THINK IT'S A GREAT LOCATION THERE. BUT AS WE KNOW IT'S IT IS CHARTING NEW WATERS. THERE'S CURRENTLY NOT A RETAIL ESTABLISHMENT IN THAT PARTICULAR AREA OF SANDY SPRINGS CIRCLE. AND ALSO YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE EXTENSIVE CONSTRUCTION ONGOING ACROSS THE STREET WITH TRAMMELL CROW'S HILLCREST DEVELOPMENT THAT FROM TIME TO TIME COULD CREATE TRAFFIC CHALLENGES AND PERHAPS EVEN PARKING CHALLENGES AND OBVIOUSLY LOTS OF DUST, AS WE'RE ALREADY SEEING AT SOME OF THE BUSINESSES DOWN THE STREET FROM THAT SITE. AND IN ORDER, GIVEN THAT IT'S AN INITIAL LEASE TERM OF TEN YEARS, AND IT'S VERY MUCH IMPORTANT TO US TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY'RE SUCCESSFUL THERE. WE'VE PROPOSED 12 MONTH RENT ABATEMENT WITH THEIR LEASE PAYMENTS BEGINNING ON THE FIRST DAY OF THE 13TH MONTH, STARTING AT $25 PER SQUARE FOOT FOR WHAT WE CONSIDER TO BE THE LEASABLE USABLE RETAIL SPACE, WHICH IS 20 30FTā S. AND IT WOULD INCREASE IN DIFFERENT INCREMENTS. AS YOU SEE, THEY'RE CLIMBING BY YEAR 5 TO 2750, THEN IN YEAR 6 TO $30 A FOOT AND CONTINUING WITH ANNUAL 2% INCREASES UNTIL AT THE CLOSE OF THE TEN YEAR TERM, THEY WOULD BE PAYING 3249 A SQUARE FOOT. THEY HAVE THEN ALSO REQUESTED TWO FIVE YEAR RENEWAL OPTIONS AND THE THE LEASE PAYMENTS WOULD CONTINUE TO GO UP IN EACH OF THOSE RENEWAL OPTIONS BY 2% PER YEAR.BUT WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE FIRST TEN YEARS, IT WOULD BE TOTAL RENTAL COLLECTIONS TO THE CITY OF 528,000. FOR THE MOST PART, THIS IS NOT A WHAT'S CALLED A TRIPLE NET LEASE. THEY WILL BE NOT TAKING ALL OF THE BUILDING AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE, BUT FOR THE MAJORITY. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE AREN'T PROPERTY TAXES ON THAT PROPERTY, SO THEY WILL NOT THEY WILL NOT BE A NEED FOR THEM TO PAY PROPERTY TAXES, BUT THEY WILL BE COVERING THEIR INSURANCE COSTS. THEY'LL BE COVERING THE CITY WILL PROVIDE BASIC LANDSCAPE SERVICES, BUT ANYTHING LIKE HEAVY PLANTINGS, THEY'LL EITHER BE DOING IT THEMSELVES OR THEY'LL BE WORKING WITH THE NORTH FULTON GARDEN CLUB, WHICH CURRENTLY DOES PLANTINGS THERE AT THE WILLIAM PAYNE HOUSE NOW. AND OF COURSE, THEY'LL COVER ALL OF THEIR UTILITIES COSTS, SECURITY AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE, THE THINGS THAT ARE REQUIRED FOR THEM TO RUN THEIR BUSINESS. WE'RE GOING TO TURN THE THE BUILDING OVER TO THEM IN GOOD WORKING ORDER. THE HVAC AND MECHANICAL SYSTEMS ARE RELATIVELY NEW. DAVE TELLS ME HE THINKS WE REPLACED THESE IN THE LAST 3 OR 4 YEARS. DAVE, IS THAT CORRECT? AND SO WE BELIEVE THAT THEY'RE IN GOOD WORKING ORDER AND ELECTRICAL PANELS AND EVERYTHING SHOULD BE PRETTY MUCH READY FOR THEM TO TAKE POSSESSION OF. SO ECONOMICALLY, IN ADDITION TO THE 528,000 IN RENT PAYMENTS IN THE FIRST DECADE, IF YOU CONSIDER THE ADDITIONAL INVESTMENT THEY'LL MAKE IN FURNITURE, FIXTURES, EQUIPMENT AND HARD COST, THEY'LL PUT ANOTHER APPROXIMATELY 281,000 OF THEIR DOLLARS INTO THIS PROJECT, MINUS THE COMMISSION TO THE SHOPPING CENTER GROUP, WOULD BE AN ECONOMIC IMPACT, IN ESSENCE, TO THE CITY. OVER A DECADE OF $788,000. SO ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT BEFORE WE GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE? ALL RIGHT. HOW DOES THIS LEASE WITH SUMMIT AND THEIR ENGAGEMENT IN THIS PROPERTY MEET THE GOALS THAT WE'VE DISCUSSED FOR WILLIAMS? PAYNE, FIRST OF ALL, I THINK IT'S BEEN IMPORTANT FOR ALL OF US TO SELECT A USER THAT REALLY PRESERVES THE BEAUTY AND THE HISTORY OF THE WILLIAMS, PAYNE HOUSE AND THE SURROUNDING GROUNDS, AND TO PROVIDE A HIGHLY DESIRABLE PATRON EXPERIENCE ACROSS A BROAD DEMOGRAPHICS OF COMMUNITY.
GIVEN THAT THE COMPANY HAS BEEN IN BUSINESS SINCE 1998. AGAIN, THIS WILL BE THEIR 21ST OR 22ND LOCATION. THEY'RE IN OTHER MARKETS LIKE SANDY SPRINGS, LIKE DOWNTOWN ROSWELL OR DUNWOODY OR BROOKHAVEN, WHERE THEY'RE VERY ACCUSTOMED TO SERVING RESIDENTS SO SIMILAR TO OURS AND ACTIVATING WITH THEIR COMMUNITIES IN THOSE MARKETS. WE THINK THEY'RE AN EXCELLENT, EXCELLENT SELECTION TO ALSO ACTIVATE THE WILLIAMS PAYNE HOUSE FOR THE CITY, SELECT A USER WITH STRONG OPERATING HISTORY. FINANCIAL SECURITY IS IMPORTANT TO US. THE LAST THING I THINK THE PFA WANTS TO BE DOING IS, IS HAVING TO FORCE A BUSINESS OUT OF THE BUILDING FOR NON RENT PAYMENT, SO IT WAS IMPORTANT TO US TO LOOK AT A COMPANY THAT HAD BEEN IN BUSINESS FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS, LIKE THEY HAVE, AND WHO'S MAKING A SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMENT OF ALMOST $300,000 OF THEIR OWN MONEY INTO THE PROPERTY. AND PRINCIPLES FROM THEIRS, FROM
[01:15:02]
THE COMPANY WILL BE PERSONALLY GUARANTEEING THIS LEASE. SO THEY'RE MAKING A REAL FINANCIAL COMMITMENT TO THE CITY, GENERATING ACCEPTABLE FINANCIAL TERMS TO THE CITY, WHICH WE BELIEVE THIS DOES. AS YOU SAW THERE IN RENT, IT'S 528,000 IN THE FIRST TEN YEARS, PLUS THE ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS THEY'LL MAKE TO THE HOUSE. AND FINALLY, WE'RE LOOKING AT THIS TO SOME DEGREE AS INITIAL ACTIVATION OF CITY SPRINGS 2.0. IT'LL BE THE FIRST FOOD AND BEVERAGE PROJECT IN CITY SPRINGS 2.0, AND PERHAPS COULD SET THE STAGE AND BE A PRELUDE FOR WHAT COULD COME DOWN THE FUTURE DOWN THE ROAD IN THE FUTURE. SO FOR THOSE FOUR REASONS, WE FEEL LIKE SUMMIT REPRESENTS THE RIGHT SELECTION FOR THIS PROPERTY. SO THAT'S OUR PRESENTATION. I WILL SAY THAT WE'VE GOT SOME ADDITIONAL RENTAL NUMBERS IF YOU'D LIKE TO SEE THEM IN YEARS 11 THROUGH 15 AND 16 THROUGH 20. BUT WE REALLY FOCUSED ON THE FIRST TEN BECAUSE WE FELT LIKE THAT WAS THE THE FINANCIAL WINDOW THAT YOU ALL WOULD BE MOST INTERESTED IN SEEING. YOU'VE HEARD THE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, WHAT'S THE DESIRE OF COUNCIL CHAIRMAN PAUL? MISS MUELLER, I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE.AGENDA ITEM PFA 2025 DASH 22 A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY GENERAL MANAGER AND THE CITY ATTORNEY TO NEGOTIATE A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH SUMMIT SANDY SPRINGS LLC AND AUTHORIZE THE AUTHORITY GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE LEASE AGREEMENT. WE HAVE A MOTION BY MISS MUELLER. IS THERE A SECOND MOTION BY MISS MUELLER, SECONDED BY MISS ROCHELLE, THAT WE APPROVE PFA 20 2522 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY GENERAL MANAGER AND THE CITY ATTORNEY TO NEGOTIATE A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH SUMMIT SANDY SPRINGS LLC AND AUTHORIZING THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE LEASE. ANY DISCUSSION, MISS MUELLER? SO I THINK THIS IS FANTASTIC NEWS. I WAS REALLY EXCITED, AND I EVEN GOT MORE EXCITED WHEN I LEARNED THAT WE HAVE OWNERSHIP OWNERS FROM SANDY SPRINGS. I MEAN, WOW, THAT'S A GREAT BONUS AND I CAN'T WAIT TO HAVE MY FIRST CUP OF COFFEE, SOME BEVERAGE, MAYBE SOME MUSIC. AND I THINK IT'S GOOD NEWS THAT WE'RE GOING TO ALSO WORK WITH. I KNOW THE NORTH FULTON MASTER GARDENERS HAD AN INTEREST BACK IN SEPTEMBER ABOUT COMING IN AND WORKING ON SOME OF THE GARDENS AROUND THE MILL HOUSE SO THEY CAN DO BEAUTIFUL WORK, AND I HOPE WE STILL WORK WITH THEM. THEY'VE ACTUALLY ALREADY REACHED OUT AND THEY'VE WASN'T YOU THAT TALKED WITH THEM OR SOMEBODY. CITY TALKED TO THE NORTH FULTON MASTER GARDENERS, AND WE'RE GOING TO MAKE THAT CONNECTION WITH ADAM AND HIS TEAM AND GET THAT RELATIONSHIP BUILDING. YEAH. THANK YOU, CHRIS AND TEAM FOR YOUR WORK. THANK YOU, MR. PAULSON. THANK YOU CHAIRMAN. THANKS, CHRIS. POINT OF CLARIFICATION. WE JUST QUIT CLAIM DEED TWO PARCELS TO THE PFA. THIS LEASE PERTAINS TO THE JUST THE WILLIAM PAYNE HOUSE. THAT PARCEL OR IS IT STRICTLY THE BUILDING AND HOW DOES THAT AFFECT THEIR ABILITY TO USE THE OTHER LAWN AREA.
THAT'S ON THE SECOND PART. HOW DOES ALL THAT WORK? SO JOHN, TO TO DAN'S POINT EARLIER, WE WILL BE DOING A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY AND WE'LL CREATE DELINEATING LINES THAT WILL BECOME AN AMENDMENT OR AN ADDENDUM TO THE LEASE THAT WILL REFLECT WHAT SUMMIT COFFEE WILL BE LEASING. IT IS THE WILLIAM PAYNE HOUSE AND THE LAND IMMEDIATELY SURROUNDING IT.
THERE ARE SOME PATHWAYS THERE. THERE'S A PATHWAY THAT COMES IN FROM SANDY SPRINGS CIRCLE INTO THE TOP FLOOR OF THE HOUSE. THERE ARE TWO PATHWAYS THAT COME IN ON THE SIDE, ONE ON THE SOUTH SIDE FROM SANDY SPRINGS CIRCLE, ONE ON THE NORTH SIDE FROM HILDEBRAND. SO THEIR PROPERTY WILL ENCOMPASS THOSE PATHWAYS AS WELL, AND IT WILL GO TO THE STAIRWELLS THAT GO DOWN INTO THE GREEN SPACE, BUT WILL NOT INCLUDE ANY OF THAT GREEN SPACE. WHAT WE'VE TALKED ABOUT WITH THEM IS IF THERE ARE EVENTS THAT THE CITY IS DOING AND AND WE'VE ALREADY HAD GROUPS SECURE THAT PROPERTY FOR THE DAY, THEN THEY WOULD OBVIOUSLY NEED TO BE RESPECTFUL OF THAT AND NOT HAVE EVENTS THERE. BUT IF THE PARK IS NOT BEING USED, THEY COULD COME TO THE CITY LIKE ANY GROUP WOULD AND REQUEST TO, YOU KNOW, HAVE US ISSUE A USE PERMIT FOR THEM TO USE THAT. AND WE'VE TALKED ABOUT FOR, FOR EXAMPLE, HAVING A GUITAR PLAYER ON THE GAZEBO AND HAVE CHAIRS SET UP THERE IN THE GREEN SPACE, AND THEY WOULD MANAGE THAT PROCESS. WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THEM. THERE'S A FIRE PIT AREA. THEY'RE TALKED ABOUT THEM GETTING THAT CLEANED UP AND SORT OF SHAPED UP SO WE COULD START DOING A S'MORES PARTY ON FRIDAY NIGHTS OR IDEAS LIKE THAT. SO IT WOULD BE THEY WOULD NOT HAVE UNFETTERED USE OF THAT, BUT WE WOULD CERTAINLY HOPE THAT THEY WOULD TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THAT GREEN SPACE ALMOST AS AN ADDITIONAL WAY OF ACTIVATING WITH OUR TEAM HERE AT THE CITY, USING THAT SPACE FOR EVENTS THAT REALLY SERVE THE COMMUNITY AT LARGE. THERE WOULD NOT BE A PROHIBITION. THE PUBLIC COULD COME AT ANY TIME.
THE PUBLIC WILL STILL HAVE USES OF THE PATHWAYS, THE STAIRWELLS, THE GREEN SPACE. SO THERE'LL BE NO PROHIBITION AT ALL OF THE PUBLIC HAVING ACCESS TO TO THE FACILITY. AND OBVIOUSLY FOR THEM, THEY WANT THEIR PATRONS TO BE ABLE TO HAVE A CUP OF COFFEE ON, ON THEIR PATIO AND THEN WALK RIGHT DOWN THE STEPS WITH THEIR DOG AND TAKE A WALK THROUGH THE PARK. SO IT'S I
[01:20:04]
THINK IT'S JUST IT'S A GREAT SYNERGY BETWEEN THE TWO. BUT FROM A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE, THEY WILL ONLY HAVE THE GROUNDS OF THE WILLIAM PAYNE HOUSE AND THE HOUSE ITSELF. THANK YOU. YES, SIR. MR. DEGIULIO. YEAH, CHRIS, IN THE PAST THAT GREEN SPACE WAS USED A LOT FOR WEDDINGS AND OTHER TYPE OF THING. AND AS AND AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, THE ORIGINAL SANDY SPRINGS IS IN THAT GREEN SPACE ON THERE. SO ARE ARE THEY GOING TO MAINTAIN THAT AREA DOWN THERE OR IS THAT SOMETHING THE CITY IS GOING TO DO, OR ARE THEY GOING TO MAINTAIN IT WHEN THEY NEED IT OR HOW'S THAT GOING TO WORK. SO WE WILL MAINTAIN THE LANDSCAPING AGREEMENT. CITY.WE'VE ALREADY INTRODUCED ADAM TO AMY HARRIS, WHO WORKS IN BILL HACKETT'S GROUP FOR THE THEATER GROUP, TALKED TO ANNA NICHOLAS, WHO DOES ALSO DOES PROGRAMING FOR THE CITY. AND SO WE'RE GOING TO MAKE THOSE CONNECTIONS. AND SO WHEN ADAM AND HIS TEAM HAVE AN EVENT THAT THEY WANT TO TALK TO THE CITY ABOUT, THEY'LL THEY'LL REACH OUT TO THOSE PEOPLE. AND AGAIN, IF THE SPACE IS AVAILABLE, THE GREEN SPACE DOWN BELOW IS AVAILABLE. AND IT'S AN EVENT THAT SEEMS TO BE A GOOD FIT FOR THE COMMUNITY. THEN THEY'LL WORK WITH OUR TEAM HERE AT THE CITY TO EXECUTE THAT. BUT WE WILL DO THE PHYSICAL MAINTENANCE OF THE GROUNDS THAT IT'S GOING TO BE UTILIZED AGAIN. YES, SIR. THAT HASN'T BEEN UTILIZED IN YEARS NOW. YES, SIR.
YOU'RE CORRECT. YEAH. MISS ROCHELLE, WELL, I WANT TO WELCOME YOU TO SANDY SPRINGS.
WE'RE VERY EXCITED. YOU HAVE A GREAT HOUSE. I'M JUST CURIOUS. I'M FROM GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA, AND THERE WAS AN AVENUE CALLED SUMMIT AVENUE, AND I WAS JUST WONDERING IF THAT IF YOU GOT THE NAME FROM THAT OR WHERE THE NAME CAME FROM. NO. OKAY. I WAS HOPING YOU WERE FROM GREENSBORO. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? WELCOME. MR. BAUMANN, I WANT TO ADD MY THANKS. AND, YES, IT'S A BIG BONUS THAT YOU ALL ARE FROM HERE. I'VE HEARD, TALK ABOUT COFFEE AND OTHER THINGS. I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO ICE CREAM. I'M AN ICE CREAM GUY, NOT A BIG COFFEE GUY. BUT I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO IT AND LOOKING FORWARD TO HAVING YOU. CHRIS.
THERE WAS SOME HISTORY BEFORE THIS. WE WENT THROUGH A PROCESS OF BEFORE THE SHOPPING CENTER GROUP, AND I'M GLAD THAT THEY CAME IN BECAUSE WHEN WE DROVE THE PROCESS, WE DID. WE HAD SOME PROSPECTS AS WELL. RIGHT BEFORE THIS. SO YOU ALL WILL PROBABLY RECALL THIS WENT THROUGH TWO TWO RFP PROCESSES. THE RFP PROCESS IN 2024 DID NOT GARNER ANY PROPOSALS AT THAT TIME. THE RFP PROCESS, WE OFFICIALLY RECEIVED TWO PROPOSALS. SOME IT HAD ACTUALLY WE HAD HAD GOTTEN KIND OF LATE INTO THE PROCESS AND WAS NOT ABLE TO GET A PROPOSAL IN IN TIME TO MEET THE RFP PROCESS. BUT WHAT WE WITH THE RFP PROCESS, WHAT WE KEPT EXPERIENCING WAS THE FACT THAT WE WERE NOT GETTING THE PROPERTY OUT INTO THE HANDS OF THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY TO PROVIDE KNOWLEDGE THAT THE PROPERTY WAS AVAILABLE. AND HONESTLY, THAT'S WHAT FOLKS LIKE ALAN AND HIS FIRM DO, AND OTHER GREAT REAL ESTATE FIRMS THAT ARE HERE IN SANDY SPRINGS. THEY GOT EXPOSURE FOR US, GOT THE PROPERTY INTO THE LISTING SERVICES. THEY HAVE CONTACTS WITHIN THE RETAIL COMMUNITY, ESPECIALLY THE RESTAURANT SECTOR. COINCIDENTALLY, IT WAS SUMMIT THAT ENDED UP COMING BACK AND BEING THE WINNING BIDDER, AND THAT WAS FOR A LOT OF REASONS WE TALKED ABOUT. BUT WE DID GET A LOT OF EXPOSURE.
WE HAD SOME OTHER VERY INTERESTING USES, BUT WE FELT LIKE GIVEN WHAT OUR GOALS WERE FOR THE PROPERTY, BOTH FROM AN ACTIVATION STANDPOINT, FROM A LEASE RISK MITIGATION STANDPOINT, MEANING AN INVESTMENT FROM THEM, WHICH THEY'RE MAKING A HEALTHY INVESTMENT IN THE PROJECT AND FROM THE AND FROM THEIR EXPERIENCE OVER NOW ALMOST 30 YEARS AND ACTIVATING FACILITIES LIKE THIS IN COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE SOUTHEAST. IT JUST IT JUST INTUITIVELY FEELS LIKE I THINK IT'S A GREAT CHOICE. AND I THINK I'M REALLY GLAD THAT MOST OF US HELD OUT. THERE WAS TALK OF A CBD TYPE USER. IT WASN'T JUST CBD, BUT THERE WAS AN OPPORTUNITY TO GO DOWN THE ROAD WITH THE CBD BUSINESS THAT MIGHT HAVE HAD SOME BAKERY AS WELL. I DON'T REMEMBER ALL THE DETAILS, BUT I'M VERY HAPPY THAT I PUSHED BACK, THAT SOME OF US PUSHED BACK ON THAT AND THAT WE HELD OUT AND WE'RE GETTING THE RIGHT USE FOR THE CITY. OKAY. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. WE'LL CALL THE QUESTION. THE QUESTION IS ON AGENDA ITEM FOR 20 2522 RESOLUTION RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY GENERAL MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY TO NEGOTIATE A LEASE WITH SUMMIT SANDY SPRINGS, LLC. ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? NO. THE ITEM IS APPROVED. THE CLERK WILL PLEASE. OUR SECRETARY WILL PLEASE READ THE NEXT ITEM. THIS IS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FOR 20 2523. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE AND ACCEPT THE SETTLEMENT AND
[01:25:03]
DISMISSAL OF THE CIVIL ACTION STYLED SANDY SPRINGS PUBLIC FACILITIES. 30 VERSUS ROSS'S EXCUSE ME, ROSSER INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND TO AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO EXECUTE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE PRESENTED BY CITY ATTORNEY DAN LEE. MR. LEE, MR. CHAIRMAN, AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY. YOU'LL RECALL THAT THE CITY ENTERED INTO A CONTRACT WITH ROSSER INTERNATIONAL TO BE THE ARCHITECT FOR THIS FACILITY WE'RE SITTING IN AND EVENTUALLY ASSIGNED THE CITY, ASSIGNED THAT CONTRACT TO THE PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY. CONSTRUCTION BEGAN AND IT WAS A CONTRACT WHERE THE ARCHITECT WAS SUPPOSED TO STAY AHEAD OF THE CONTRACTOR. SO MANY DAYS AND NOT LONG INTO THE CONTRACT, THEY GOT BEHIND. AS THE PROJECT DEVELOPED, THE CITY AS MOST CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS WILL HAVE FOUND DEFICIENCIES AND COMPLAINED OF THE DEFICIENCIES AND TOWARD THE END OF THE PROJECT, WITHHELD MONEY FROM THE CONTRACTOR FOR THOSE DEFICIENCIES. THE CONTRACTOR TOOK GREAT UMBRAGE WITH THAT AND FILED SUIT AGAINST THE CITY. IN THAT COMPLAINT, IT ALLEGED THESE DEFICIENCIES OF OUR ARCHITECT AT THAT TIME, OUR CONSTRUCTION LAW FIRM, TAYLOR ENGLISH, DETERMINED THAT ROSSER INTERNATIONAL WAS ABOUT TO GO UNDER, AND IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE CITY'S INTERESTS, WE FILED A LAWSUIT AGAINST ROSSER INTERNATIONAL TO RECOVER ANY DAMAGES THAT WOULD RESULT FROM THE LAWSUIT WITH HOLDER. WE EVENTUALLY SETTLED THE LAWSUIT WITH HOLDER AND PROGRESSED THE LAWSUIT AGAINST ROSSER. ROSSER DID GO INTO RECEIVERSHIP AT THAT TIME. THE OUR COMPLAINT AGAINST ROSSER, WE WERE ABLE TO RECOVER A VERDICT OF $4.1 MILLION. BUT AT THAT TIME, THE THE CLAIM MORPHED FROM A CONSTRUCTION DISCUSSION TO AN INSURANCE ISSUE. ROSSER INSURANCE CARRIER ALLEGES THAT THEY DID NOT GET PROPER NOTICE FROM ROSSER OF THE LAWSUIT. WE ALLEGE THAT THAT IS NOT ACCURATE AND THAT SOME DUTY WAS HELD BY THEIR INSURANCE AGENCY, THAT THAT WAS A GREAT DEBATE. CROSS COMPLAINTS WERE FILED AND WE HAVE BEEN TO MEDIATION FOR THE SECOND TIME IN THIS MEDIATION, THANKFULLY, AND WE'RE HERE TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION THAT WE SETTLE THIS MATTER FOR A SUM THAT ROSSER INSURANCE CARRIER WOULD PAY WITHOUT ANY ADMISSION OF LIABILITY, $900,000. MY CO-COUNSEL IN THIS MATTER, WHO IS AN INSURANCE EXPERT, AGREED THAT THIS IS THE BEST AVENUE FOR THE CITY. IT DOES TWO OTHER THINGS. ONE, IT CLOSES ALL THE ATTORNEY'S FEES THAT HAVE BEEN COSTLY IN THIS MATTER. AND SECONDLY, IT ENDS THE DISPUTE THAT HAS ADDED SOME SORT OF A SCAR TO THIS WONDERFUL FACILITY FOR AS MANY YEARS AS WE'VE BEEN IN IT. THIS WOULD CONCLUDE ALL OF THE DISCUSSIONS THAT WE HAVE HAD ABOUT PROBLEMS WITH THE FACILITY, SOME OF THE DAMAGES THAT WERE INCLUDED IN THAT 4 MILLION SINCE THAT VERDICT, THE AS THE CISTERN, THE COST ESTIMATED WAS $1 MILLION. THE CONTRACT THAT HAS BEEN SIGNED PLACES THAT REPAIRED ABOUT $238,000. SO THERE HAVE BEEN SOME REDUCTIONS IN THE COST THAT WERE PROJECTED THAT WE WERE SEEKING AGAINST THE ARCHITECT'S CONTRACT. WE BELIEVE THE $900,000 IS A A GOOD RESOLUTION OF A LONG, LONG, HARD FOUGHT MATTER. YOU'VE HEARD THE REPORT OF THE CITY ATTORNEY. WHAT'S THE DESIRE OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY? MISS? MISS ROCHELLE, I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE. AGENDA ITEM PFA 202523 TO APPROVE AND ACCEPT THE SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL OF THE CIVIL ACTION STYLED SANDY SPRINGS PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY VERSUS ROSSER INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO EXECUTE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE. WE HAVE A MOTION BY MISS ROCHELLE. IS THERE A SECOND SECOND MOTION BY MISS ROCHELLE, SECONDED BY DOCTOR KELLEY, THAT WE APPROVE? AGENDA ITEM FOR 2025 DASH 23 ACCEPTANCE OF A SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL OF THE CIVIL ACTION STYLE. SANDY SPRINGS PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY V ROSSER INTERNATIONAL AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO EXECUTE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. ANY DISCUSSION. MAYOR PAUL, MR. PAULSON, THIS IS EIGHT YEARS OLD. SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SEVEN YEARS OLD. EIGHT YEARS OLD. THE LAWSUIT. THE ORIGINAL HOLDER LAWSUIT WAS FILED IN 2019, AND OURS WAS FILED IN THE END OF 2019 AGAINST ROSSER. SIX YEARS, SIX YEARS. WELL, I'M GLAD IT'S COMING TO A CLOSE. OBVIOUSLY I WISH THERE WAS MORE MONEY INVOLVED, BUT NEGOTIATIONS ARE WHAT THEY ARE. LET'S GET THIS DONE AND GET THIS BEHIND US.ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. WE'LL CALL THE QUESTION. THE QUESTION IS ON AGENDA ITEM FOR 20 2523, APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL OF THE CIVIL CIVIL
[01:30:02]
ACTION STYLE SANDY SPRINGS PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY VERSUS ROSSER INTERNATIONAL.ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION? SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? NO. MR. CHAIRMAN, LET ME LET ME ANNOUNCE THE VOTE. THE ITEM IS APPROVED. MR. DEGIULIO. CHAIRMAN, I MOVE ADJOURNMENT.
MR. DEGIULIO MOVES. ADJOURNMENT, SECONDED BY MR. PAULSON. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.